Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the figure, Excel is used to find the smallest root of the quadratic equation x 2 + bx + c = 0 for c = 4 and c = 4 × 10 5. The difference between direct evaluation using the quadratic formula and the approximation described above for widely spaced roots is plotted vs. b.
The next number in the sequence (the smallest number of additive persistence 5) is 2 × 10 2×(10 22 − 1)/9 − 1 (that is, 1 followed by 2 222 222 222 222 222 222 222 nines). For any fixed base, the sum of the digits of a number is proportional to its logarithm ; therefore, the additive persistence is proportional to the iterated logarithm .
Now separate the digits into pairs, starting from the decimal point and going both left and right. The decimal point of the root will be above the decimal point of the square. One digit of the root will appear above each pair of digits of the square. Beginning with the left-most pair of digits, do the following procedure for each pair:
If x is a simple root of the polynomial , then Laguerre's method converges cubically whenever the initial guess, , is close enough to the root . On the other hand, when x 1 {\displaystyle \ x_{1}\ } is a multiple root convergence is merely linear, with the penalty of calculating values for the polynomial and its first and second derivatives at ...
Given a continuous function defined from [,] to such that () (), where at the cost of one query one can access the values of () on any given .And, given a pre-specified target precision >, a root-finding algorithm is designed to solve the following problem with the least amount of queries as possible:
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Finding roots in a specific region of the complex plane, typically the real roots or the real roots in a given interval (for example, when roots represents a physical quantity, only the real positive ones are interesting). For finding one root, Newton's method and other general iterative methods work generally well.
Don't rely on bloviating pundits to tell you who'll prevail on Hollywood's big night. The Huffington Post crunched the stats on every Oscar nominee of the past 30 years to produce a scientific metric for predicting the winners at the 2013 Academy Awards.