Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Pulse-Doppler signal processing separates reflected signals into a number of frequency filters. There is a separate set of filters for each ambiguous range. The I and Q samples described above are used to begin the filtering process. These samples are organized into the m × n matrix of time domain samples shown in the top half of the diagram.
In the cross-range coordinate, the similar resolution is mainly proportional to the bandwidth of the Doppler shift of the signal returns within the beamwidth. Since Doppler frequency depends on the angle of the scattering point's direction from the broadside direction, the Doppler bandwidth available within the beamwidth is the same at all ranges.
Range ambiguity resolution is a technique used with medium pulse-repetition frequency (PRF) radar to obtain range information for distances that exceed the distance between transmit pulses. This signal processing technique is required with pulse-Doppler radar .
Radar pulsing causes a phenomenon called aliasing, which occurs when the Doppler frequency created by reflector motion exceeds the pulse repetition frequency (PRF). [1] This concept is related to range ambiguity resolution. Doppler frequency shift is introduced onto reflected signals used by radar.
Pompano Beach has been previously cited by Southeast Florida-based real estate agent Julio Ybanez as one of the best Florida cities to buy property over the next five years. Ybanez said homes for ...
A broker price opinion, or BPO, is an estimate of a property’s value conducted by a real estate broker, agent or qualified realty firm. The real estate professional will consider comparable ...
Pulse-Doppler systems measure the range to objects by measuring the elapsed time between sending a pulse of radio energy and receiving a reflection of the object. Radio waves travel at the speed of light , so the distance to the object is the elapsed time multiplied by the speed of light, divided by two – there and back.
That usually comes out to about 6%, split between a seller’s broker and a buyer’s agent. But that model has come under intensifying scrutiny from critics who have likened it to a cartel .