Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Pulse-Doppler signal processing separates reflected signals into a number of frequency filters. There is a separate set of filters for each ambiguous range. The I and Q samples described above are used to begin the filtering process. These samples are organized into the m × n matrix of time domain samples shown in the top half of the diagram.
Range ambiguity resolution is a technique used with medium pulse-repetition frequency (PRF) radar to obtain range information for distances that exceed the distance between transmit pulses. This signal processing technique is required with pulse-Doppler radar .
Pulse-Doppler systems measure the range to objects by measuring the elapsed time between sending a pulse of radio energy and receiving a reflection of the object. Radio waves travel at the speed of light , so the distance to the object is the elapsed time multiplied by the speed of light, divided by two – there and back.
In the cross-range coordinate, the similar resolution is mainly proportional to the bandwidth of the Doppler shift of the signal returns within the beamwidth. Since Doppler frequency depends on the angle of the scattering point's direction from the broadside direction, the Doppler bandwidth available within the beamwidth is the same at all ranges.
SISO range Doppler imaging results comparison with three 5 dB and six 25 dB targets. (a) ground truth, (b) matched filter (MF), (c) IAA algorithm, (d) SAMV-0 algorithm. All power levels are in dB. Both MF and IAA methods are limited in resolution with respect to the doppler axis. SAMV-0 offers superior resolution in terms of both range and ...
Radar pulsing causes a phenomenon called aliasing, which occurs when the Doppler frequency created by reflector motion exceeds the pulse repetition frequency (PRF). [1] This concept is related to range ambiguity resolution. Doppler frequency shift is introduced onto reflected signals used by radar.
Other difficulties arise when the interference covariance matrix is ill-conditioned, making the inversion numerically unstable. [5] In general, this adaptive filtering must be performed for each of the unambiguous range bins in the system, for each target of interest (angle-Doppler coordinates), making for a massive computational burden. [4]
When the PRF of the "jamming" radar is very similar to "our" radar, those apparent distances may be very slow-changing, just like real targets. By using stagger, a radar designer can force the "jamming" to jump around erratically in apparent range, inhibiting integration and reducing or even suppressing its impact on true target detection.