enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Criticism of atheism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_atheism

    Criticism of atheism is criticism of the concepts, validity, or impact of atheism, including associated political and social implications.Criticisms include positions based on the history of science, philosophical and logical criticisms, findings in both the natural and social sciences, theistic apologetic arguments, arguments pertaining to ethics and morality, the effects of atheism on the ...

  3. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialogues_Concerning...

    Cleanthes is an "experimental theist"—"an exponent of orthodox empiricism" [6] —who bases his beliefs about God's existence and nature upon a version of the teleological argument, which uses evidence of design in the universe to argue for God's existence and resemblance to the human mind.

  4. Atheism during the Age of Enlightenment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism_during_the_Age_of...

    David Hume was accused of atheism for his writings on the "natural history of religion"; [3] Pierre Bayle was accused of atheism for defending the possibility of an ethical atheist society in his Critical Dictionary, and Baruch Spinoza was frequently regarded as an atheist for his "pantheism". However, all three of these figures defended ...

  5. History of atheism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_atheism

    Atheist as a label of practical godlessness was used at least as early as 1577. [14] The term atheism was derived from the French athéisme, [15] and appears in English about 1587. [16] An earlier work, from about 1534, used the term atheonism. [17] [18] Related words emerged later: deist in 1621, [19] theist in 1662, [20] deism in 1675, [21 ...

  6. Argument from poor design - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_poor_design

    The argument from poor design, also known as the dysteleological argument, is an argument against the assumption of the existence of a creator God, based on the reasoning that any omnipotent and omnibenevolent deity or deities would not create organisms with the perceived suboptimal designs that occur in nature.

  7. Acceptance of evolution by religious groups - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceptance_of_evolution_by...

    Theistic evolutionists believe that there is a God, that God is the creator of the material universe and (by consequence) all life within, and that biological evolution is a natural process within that creation. Evolution, according to this view, is simply a tool that God employed to develop human life.

  8. Rejection of evolution by religious groups - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rejection_of_evolution_by...

    Recurring cultural, political, and theological rejection of evolution by religious groups [a] exists regarding the origins of the Earth, of humanity, and of other life. In accordance with creationism, species were once widely believed to be fixed products of divine creation, but since the mid-19th century, evolution by natural selection has been established by the scientific community as an ...

  9. Problem of the creator of God - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_the_creator_of_God

    For the God who created and upholds the universe was not created – he is eternal. He was not 'made' and therefore subject to the laws that science discovered; it was he who made the universe with its laws. Indeed, that fact constitutes the fundamental distinction between God and the universe. The universe came to be, God did not.