Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 461, 67 ER 189 is a leading English precedent in corporate law. In any action in which a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company, the proper claimant is the company itself.
Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 461, 67 ER 189; Hadley v. Baxendale [1854] EWHC J70 (Exch) (23 February 1854), High Court (England and Wales) Blyth v. Company Proprietors of the Birmingham Water Works [1856] EWHC J65 (Exch) (6 February 1856), High Court (England and Wales) Raffles v. Wichelhaus [1864] EWHC J19 (Exch) (20 January 1864), High ...
The board of directors invariably holds the right to sue in the company's name as a general power of management. [2] So if wrongs were alleged to have been done to the company, the principle from the case of Foss v Harbottle, [3] was that the company itself was the proper claimant, and it followed that as a general rule that only the board could bring claims in court.
Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 461, 67 ER 189; Boughtwood v Oak Investment Partnership XII, Ltd Partnership [2010] EWCA Civ 23; US corporate law; New York Business Corporation Law section 1104-a, the holders of 20 per cent of voting shares of a non-public corporation may request that the corporation be wound up on grounds of oppression. Donahue v.
Lane was one of the defendant architects in the landmark case Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189, which established the precedent that where a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company, the proper claimant is the company itself.
Smith v Croft (No 2) [1988] Ch 114 is a UK company law case concerning derivative claims. Its principle that in allowing a derivative claim to continue the court will have regard to the majority of the minority's views has been codified in Companies Act 2006 , section 263(4).
Adshead was one of the defendant directors in the landmark case Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189, which established the precedent that where a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company, the proper claimant is the company itself. Adshead became a member of Manchester Corporation, serving as Alderman for St. Anne's Ward.
Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 461 (and the eponymous "rule in Foss v Harbottle"), and; Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100; He was also the judge at first instance in Foley v Hill (1848) 2 HLC 28.