enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Engblom v. Carey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Engblom_v._Carey

    Under the incorporation doctrine, Supreme Court cases found that individual amendments applied to the states. The few times the Supreme Court has cited the Third Amendment in decisions, it was in consideration of general constitutional principles—particularly privacy rights. Chief among them is the decision in Griswold v.

  3. Hawke v. Smith - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawke_v._Smith

    Hawke v. Smith, 253 U.S. 221 (1920), was a United States Supreme Court case coming out of the state of Ohio.It challenged the constitutionality of a provision in the state constitution allowing the state legislature's ratification of federal constitutional amendments to be challenged by a petition signed by six percent of Ohio voters.

  4. Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

    Members of 16 state legislatures have called for a constitutional amendment to reverse the Supreme Court's decision. [98] Most of these are non-binding resolutions, but three states—Vermont, California, and Illinois—called for an Article V Convention to draft and propose a federal constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United.

  5. Loving v. Virginia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia

    Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark civil rights decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that ruled that laws banning interracial marriage violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  6. Kelo v. City of New London - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London

    Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development does not violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

  7. Supreme Court ruling to keep Trump on 2024 ballot goes ‘well ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-ruling-keep-trump...

    The post Supreme Court ruling to keep Trump on 2024 ballot goes ‘well beyond’ 14th Amendment case appeared first on TheGrio. “The Supreme Court just honestly does not like to rule on ...

  8. District of Columbia v. Heller - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

    District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States.It ruled that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms—unconnected with service in a militia—for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and ...

  9. List of overruled United States Supreme Court decisions

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_overruled_United...

    It does not include decisions that have been abrogated by subsequent constitutional amendment or by subsequent amending statutes. As of 2018, the Supreme Court had overruled more than 300 of its own cases. [1] The longest period between the original decision and the overruling decision is 136 years, for the common law Admiralty cases Minturn v