Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The additive persistence of 2718 is 2: first we find that 2 + 7 + 1 + 8 = 18, and then that 1 + 8 = 9. The multiplicative persistence of 39 is 3, because it takes three steps to reduce 39 to a single digit: 39 → 27 → 14 → 4. Also, 39 is the smallest number of multiplicative persistence 3.
The concept of multiplicity is fundamental for Bézout's theorem, as it allows having an equality instead of a much weaker inequality. Intuitively, the multiplicity of a common zero of several polynomials is the number of zeros into which the common zero can split when the coefficients are slightly changed.
We can also define the multiplicity of the zeroes and poles of a meromorphic function. If we have a meromorphic function =, take the Taylor expansions of g and h about a point z 0, and find the first non-zero term in each (denote the order of the terms m and n respectively) then if m = n, then the point has non-zero value.
In various areas of mathematics, the zero set of a function is the set of all its zeros. More precisely, if f : X → R {\displaystyle f:X\to \mathbb {R} } is a real-valued function (or, more generally, a function taking values in some additive group ), its zero set is f − 1 ( 0 ) {\displaystyle f^{-1}(0)} , the inverse image of { 0 ...
If is a prime number, then the ring of integers modulo has the zero-product property (in fact, it is a field). The Gaussian integers are an integral domain because they are a subring of the complex numbers. In the strictly skew field of quaternions, the zero-product property holds. This ring is not an integral domain, because the multiplication ...
There is no general definition of "close enough", but the criterion for convergence has to do with how "wiggly" the function is on the interval between the initial values. For example, if f {\displaystyle f} is differentiable on that interval and there is a point where f ′ = 0 {\displaystyle f'=0} on the interval, then the algorithm may not ...
For example, the rhamphoid cusp y 2 = x 5 has a singularity of order 2 at the origin. After blowing up at its singular point it becomes the ordinary cusp y 2 = x 3, which still has multiplicity 2. It is clear that the singularity has improved, since the degree of defining polynomial has decreased. This does not happen in general.
If f has a zero of order m at z 0 then for every small enough ρ > 0 and for sufficiently large k ∈ N (depending on ρ), f k has precisely m zeroes in the disk defined by |z − z 0 | < ρ, including multiplicity.