Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Belmont Report summarizes ethical principles and guidelines for human subject research. Three core principles are identified: respect for persons, Beneficence, and Justice. The three primary areas of application were stated as informed consent, assessment of risks and benefits, and selection of human subjects in research.
Management selects a risk response strategy for specific risks identified and analyzed, which may include: Avoidance: exiting the activities giving rise to risk; Reduction: taking action to reduce the likelihood or impact related to the risk; Alternative Actions: deciding and considering other feasible steps to minimize risks
The IPCC Fifth Assessment Report followed the same general format as the Fourth Assessment Report, with three Working Group reports and a Synthesis report. [5] [1] The report was delivered in stages, starting with the report from Working Group I in September 2013. [5] It reported on the physical science basis, based on 9,200 peer-reviewed studies.
A quantitative report: Description of the quantitative methodologies used in the context of the ORSA, results, defined strategy, and conclusions. The US ORSA report will contain three sections, as described in the ORSA Guidance Manual: [4] Description of the insurer’s enterprise risk management framework; Insurer assessment of risk exposures
Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) is a program of the US Food and Drug Administration for the monitoring of medications with a high potential for serious adverse effects. REMS applies only to specific prescription drugs, but can apply to brand name or generic drugs. [1] The REMS program was formalized in 2007.
The Technical Summary (TS) provides a level of detail between the Summary for Policymakers (SPM) and the full report. In addition, an interactive atlas was made "for a flexible spatial and temporal analysis of both data-driven climate change information and assessment findings in the report".
The IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR), Climate Change 2001, is an assessment of available scientific and socio-economic information on climate change by the IPCC. Statements of the IPCC or information from the TAR were often used as a reference showing a scientific consensus on the subject of global warming .
Working Group II: Impacts Assessment of Climate Change, edited by W.J. McG. Tegart, G.W. Sheldon and D.C. Griffiths; Working Group III:The IPCC Response Strategies; Each section included a summary for policymakers. This format was followed in subsequent Assessment Reports. The executive summary of the policymakers' summary of the WG I report ...