Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that the use of a drug-sniffing police dog during a routine traffic stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, even if the initial infraction is unrelated to drug offenses.
Florida v. Harris, 568 U.S. 237 (2013), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court addressed the reliability of a dog sniff by a detection dog trained to identify narcotics, under the specific context of whether law enforcement's assertions that the dog is trained or certified is sufficient to establish probable cause for a search of a vehicle under the Fourth Amendment to the United ...
In the United States, a courthouse facility dog is a professionally trained facility dog that has graduated from an accredited assistance dog organization that is a member of Assistance Dogs International. Such dogs assist crime victims, witnesses and others during the investigation and prosecution of crimes, as well as during other legal ...
They are stubborn and have a mind of their own, and so training may take more time. Because of their short, squished faces they're known to snort, wheeze, and snore, not to mention slobbering and ...
Glitch came to the Memphis Police Department in January, and has rapidly become a favorite amongst officers. He uses his nose to sniff out technology.
The federal court filings of July 2 alleged that Vick's property was used as the "main staging area for housing and training the pit bulls involved in the dog fighting venture". A source close to the investigation told ESPN's Len Pasquarelli that the events of Friday [July 6] were "very helpful in the overall and ongoing investigation into an ...
Related: Dog Mom Lists ‘Crimes’ Her Boxer Committed This Week ‘Law and Order’ Style Interesting English Bulldog Facts I think English Bulldogs are some of the most entertaining dogs around.
Florida v. Harris (2013) – The Court held that a police dog's alert to the exterior of a vehicle gives the officer probable cause to search the vehicle without a warrant. [48] Further, the Court affirmed that the state does not have to prove each dog's reliability in order for evidence gathered from them to be valid in court. [49] Florida v.