Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Download as PDF; Printable version; This user believes that we should do no harm on any biographical article. ...
Do No Harm is a United States medical and policy advocacy group. The group opposes gender-affirming care for minors and diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in medicine and medical education, including race-conscious medical school admissions and other identity-based considerations regarding health care decision-making. [ 1 ]
A digital public good is defined by the UN Secretary-General’s Roadmap for Digital Cooperation, [5] as: "open source software, open data, open AI models, open standards and open content that adhere to privacy and other applicable laws and best practices, do no harm, and help attain the SDGs."
The fear: 'Garbage in, garbage out' Patients seem to have reason to doubt AI's current capabilities. A study published in May evaluating large multimodal models (LMMs), which interpret media like ...
First, do no harm, or in Latin primum non nocere, a medical injunction; Do No Harm: Stories of Life, Death and Brain Surgery, a 2014 book by Henry Marsh; Harm principle, a philosophical concept "Do No Harm" (HR report on Bahrain), a 2011 report by Physicians for Human Rights; Do No Harm (organization), a United States anti-trans advocacy group
“Do no harm” is an individual responsibility: Safety is a system property 7: Secrecy is necessary: Transparency is necessary 8: The system reacts to needs: Needs are anticipated 9: Cost reduction is sought: Waste is continuously decreased 10: Preference is given to professional roles over the system: Cooperation among clinicians is a priority
The "do no harm" principle does not justify the removal of relevant negative information about a living person. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and articles must be written from a neutral point of view. Thus, they must represent fairly and without bias all significant views and information (that have been published by reliable sources).
one should remove evil or harm; one should practice good; Ordinary moral discourse and most philosophical systems state that a prohibition on doing harm to others as in #1 is more compelling than any duty to benefit others as in #2–4. This makes the concept of "first do no harm" different from the other aspects of beneficence. [2]