enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Detection error tradeoff - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detection_error_tradeoff

    The normal deviate mapping (or normal quantile function, or inverse normal cumulative distribution) is given by the probit function, so that the horizontal axis is x = probit(P fa) and the vertical is y = probit(P fr), where P fa and P fr are the false-accept and false-reject rates.

  3. Keystroke dynamics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keystroke_dynamics

    As such, the traditional benchmarks of False Acceptance Rate (FAR) and False Rejection Rates (FRR) no longer have linear relationships. The benefit to keystroke dynamics (as well as other behavioral biometrics) is that FRR/FAR can be adjusted by changing the acceptance threshold at the individual level.

  4. Type I and type II errors - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_I_and_type_II_errors

    In statistical hypothesis testing, a type I error, or a false positive, is the rejection of the null hypothesis when it is actually true. A type II error, or a false negative, is the failure to reject a null hypothesis that is actually false. [1] Type I error: an innocent person may be convicted. Type II error: a guilty person may be not convicted.

  5. Biometrics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biometrics

    Biometrics are body measurements and calculations related to human characteristics and features. ... (false acceptance) by the biometric system, cause adaptation ...

  6. Facial recognition system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facial_recognition_system

    Among all biometric systems, facial recognition has the highest false acceptance and rejection rates, [166] thus questions have been raised on the effectiveness of or bias of face recognition software in cases of railway and airport security, law enforcement and housing and employment decisions. [167] [5]

  7. Quantum readout - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_readout

    [7] The result for dimension K and n quanta is that the false acceptance probability in a single round cannot exceed (n+1)/(n+K). The security of the continuous-variable quantum authentication of PUFs against an emulation attack, has been also addressed in the framework of Holevo's bound and Fano's inequality, [8] as well as a man-in-the-middle ...

  8. False positives and false negatives - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_positives_and_false...

    The false positive rate (FPR) is the proportion of all negatives that still yield positive test outcomes, i.e., the conditional probability of a positive test result given an event that was not present. The false positive rate is equal to the significance level. The specificity of the test is equal to 1 minus the false positive rate.

  9. Passwordless authentication - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passwordless_authentication

    For example, the device may use biometrics like a fingerprint scanner or facial recognition for user identification. [12] Key generation: The user's device generates a public/private key pair and sends the public key to the server for future verification. [13] Once they have registered, a user can log in to the system via the following process: