Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Regulation of algorithms, or algorithmic regulation, is the creation of laws, rules and public sector policies for promotion and regulation of algorithms, particularly in artificial intelligence and machine learning. [1] [2] [3] For the subset of AI algorithms, the term regulation of artificial intelligence is used.
Algorithmic system inspections to support enforcement of the DSA. Technical tests on algorithmic systems to enhance the understanding of their functioning. Advice on procedures to secure data access to regulators and researchers. 2. Scientific research and foresight. Study of the short, mid and long-term societal impact of algorithmic systems.
Lastly, the transparency principle states that a system's transparency is only necessary when there is a high risk of violating fundamental rights. As easily observed, the Brazilian Legal Framework for Artificial Intelligence lacks binding and obligatory clauses and is rather filled with relaxed guidelines.
The phrases "algorithmic transparency" and "algorithmic accountability" [2] are sometimes used interchangeably – especially since they were coined by the same people – but they have subtly different meanings. Specifically, "algorithmic transparency" states that the inputs to the algorithm and the algorithm's use itself must be known, but ...
Government by algorithm [1] (also known as algorithmic regulation, [2] regulation by algorithms, algorithmic governance, [3] [4] algocratic governance, algorithmic legal order or algocracy [5]) is an alternative form of government or social ordering where the usage of computer algorithms is applied to regulations, law enforcement, and generally any aspect of everyday life such as ...
Algorithmic regulation may refer to: Government by algorithm, use of algorithms in government; Regulation of algorithms, rules and laws for algorithms
The European Union General Data Protection Regulation (enacted 2016, taking effect 2018) extends the automated decision-making rights in the 1995 Data Protection Directive to provide a legally disputed form of a right to an explanation, stated as such in Recital 71: "[the data subject should have] the right ... to obtain an explanation of the decision reached".
As of January 2023, 17 jurisdictions have committed to implementing these rules, [23] although all 27 EU Member States and the UK have already implemented these rules as part of an amendment to the Directive on Administrative Co-Operation. In 2021, the OECD agreed an International Exchange Framework for information held by Digital Platforms ...