enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. R v Feeney - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Feeney

    R v Feeney, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 13 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the right, under section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms against unreasonable search and seizure. The Court held that the police are not permitted to enter into someone's house without a search warrant.

  3. R v Jordan (2016) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Jordan_(2016)

    R. v. Jordan [2] was a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada which rejected the framework traditionally used to determine whether an accused was tried within a reasonable time under section 11(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and replaced it with a presumptive ceiling of 18 months between the charges and the trial in a provincial court without preliminary inquiry, or 30 ...

  4. Section 11 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_11_of_the_Canadian...

    In R. v. Nova Scotia Pharmaceutical Society the Supreme Court of Canada found that an open-ended statute (prohibiting companies from "unduly" lessening competition) was not a breach of Section 11(a). In R. v. Delaronde (1997), the Supreme Court of Canada found section 11 (a) is meant not only to guarantee a fair trial but also to serve as an ...

  5. Supreme Court criminalizes homelessness allowing laws that ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-criminalizes...

    The Supreme Court will allow thecriminalization of homelessness after a majority ruled to allow laws that allow police to ticket, fine or arrest those who sleep in public areas.. On Friday, the ...

  6. R v Grant - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Grant

    R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on section 9, section 10 and section 24(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter"). The Court created a number of factors to consider when determining whether a person had been detained for the purpose of sections 9 and 10 of the Charter.

  7. R v Asante-Mensah - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Asante-Mensah

    R v Asante-Mensah, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 3, 2003 SCC 38, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision where the Court affirmed the limits to which private citizens may undertake an arrest, as well as the limits of private individuals in the use of force to protect property. This case holds particular importance as the prevalence of private security ...

  8. R v Bissonnette - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Bissonnette

    In Canada, life imprisonment exists as a criminal sentence for certain offences, and is mandatory for the offences of murder and high treason. An offender may apply for parole after serving a parole ineligibility period of 25 years for first-degree murder and high treason, and a judge-determined period between 10 and 25 years for second-degree ...

  9. R v Brown (2022) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Brown_(2022)

    R v Brown, 2022 SCC 18, is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutionality of section 33.1 of the Criminal Code, which prohibited an accused from raising self-induced intoxication as a defence to criminal charges. The Court unanimously held that the section violated the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and struck it down as ...