enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Living tree doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_tree_doctrine

    The interpretation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms also makes use of the living tree doctrine. Chief Justice Antonio Lamer stated in Re B.C. Motor Vehicle Act, "If the newly planted 'living tree' which is the Charter is to have the possibility of growth and adjustment over time, care must be taken to ensure that historical materials, such as the Minutes of Proceedings and ...

  3. Corbiere v Canada (Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corbiere_v_Canada...

    Corbiere v Canada (Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs) [1999] 2 S.C.R. 203, is a leading case from the Supreme Court of Canada where the Court expanded the scope of applicable grounds upon which a section 15(1) Charter claim can be based. This was also the first case to use the framework proposed by Law v. Canada.

  4. Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_7_of_the_Canadian...

    Still, mindful that there was still choices involved in the family situation, the Supreme Court split on whether liberty rights were infringed. Likewise, in I.L.W.U. v. The Queen (1992), the Supreme Court stressed the individual nature of section 7 to deny unions had a right to strike as part of the members' liberty.

  5. United States v Burns - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v_Burns

    United States v Burns [2001] 1 S.C.R. 283, 2001 SCC 7, was a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada that found that extradition of individuals to countries in which they may face the death penalty is a breach of fundamental justice under section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

  6. Opinion: The Supreme Court's purely ideological reasoning ...

    www.aol.com/news/opinion-supreme-courts-purely...

    The homelessness and 'Chevron deference' Supreme Court decisions change law for the worse. They never would have happened if Hillary Clinton had won in 2016. Opinion: The Supreme Court's purely ...

  7. Supreme Court Rules That Punishing the Homeless for Sleeping ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-rules-punishing...

    In 2022, the 9th Circuit upheld the district court's injunction, prompting Grants Pass to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Earlier this year, the court agreed to take the case.

  8. With homelessness on the rise, the Supreme Court weighs bans ...

    www.aol.com/news/homelessness-rise-supreme-court...

    The Supreme Court wrestled with major questions about the growing issue of homelessness on Monday as it considered whether cities can punish people for sleeping outside when shelter space is lacking.

  9. Suresh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suresh_v_Canada_(Minister...

    Suresh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in the areas of constitutional law and administrative law.The Court held that, under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, in most circumstances the government cannot deport someone to a country where they risk being tortured, but refugee claimants can be deported to their ...