enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Living tree doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_tree_doctrine

    The interpretation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms also makes use of the living tree doctrine. Chief Justice Antonio Lamer stated in Re B.C. Motor Vehicle Act, "If the newly planted 'living tree' which is the Charter is to have the possibility of growth and adjustment over time, care must be taken to ensure that historical materials, such as the Minutes of Proceedings and ...

  3. Living Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_Constitution

    The Supreme Court of Canada, in Re: Same-Sex Marriage (2004), held that the Canadian Parliament, as opposed to provincial legislatures, had the power to define marriage as including same-sex unions. It rejected claims that the constitutionally-enumerated federal authority in matters of "Marriage and Divorce" could not include same-sex marriage ...

  4. Amendments to the Constitution of Canada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amendments_to_the...

    The Supreme Court of Canada was mentioned for the first time in a constitutional document by the Constitution Act, 1982. The Supreme Court is referred to twice. First, s. 41 lists several amendments to the Constitution of Canada requiring unanimous consent. S. 41(d) includes the "composition of the Supreme Court of Canada" in this list.

  5. Baker v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baker_v_Canada_(Minister...

    On appeal, the Supreme Court of Canada reversed this decision. It held that procedural fairness required the decision-maker to consider the human rights of Baker's children. Children's human rights are outlined in the international Convention on the Rights of the Child. The Supreme Court said that decision-makers must be "reasonable".

  6. Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Beverley McLachlin

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasons_of_the_Supreme...

    United States of America v Ferras; United States of America v Latty 2006 SCC 33 : Extradition: None: Unanimous: United Mexican States v Ortega; United States of America v Fiessel 2006 SCC 34 : Extradition: None: Unanimous: Pro Swing Inc v Elta Golf Inc 2006 SCC 52 : Conflict of laws; Enforce non-monetary judgments: None: Bastarache and Charron JJ.

  7. Can sleeping outside be criminalized? Supreme Court ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/sleeping-outside-criminalized...

    The U.S. Supreme Court has recently taken up a case from Oregon about laws that restrict sleeping outside. Can sleeping outside be criminalized? Supreme Court decision could affect Columbia

  8. Supreme Court allows cities to enforce bans on homeless ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-allows-cities...

    The Supreme Court cleared the way for cities to enforce bans on homeless people sleeping outside in public places on Friday, overturning a California appeals court ruling that found such laws ...

  9. Can homeless people be fined for sleeping outside? A rural ...

    www.aol.com/news/homeless-people-fined-sleeping...

    Even if the Supreme Court overturns the 9th Circuit's decisions, Bristol said, "we still have 200 people who have to go somewhere.” "We have to accept that homelessness is a reality in America ...