Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The terms cost-effective and cost-efficient are not interchangeable although advertising execs have muddied the water beyond redemption. These were and still are economics/business terms that represent a truly important concept.
"The process brings together several components to create a system that delivers a cost efficient solution for advisors and their clients." "Processus" sounds strange, I find "mode opératoire" more adapted. May be "cost efficient solution" have a good translation with "maîtrise des coûts or...
The speaker may be unsure whether or not bringing the toy ring (to be buried - is that what is happening here?) was more cost-efficient, or they may be saying that it was not more cost-efficient. My guess is that the writer has chosen the wrong expression in "if not", and "cost-efficient" is an odd choice as well.
The objective of the project is to be cost effective and cost efficient. If cost effective is rentable, what would cost efficient be in French?
Buenos días! Os escribo para preguntar si alguien conoce el significado de este término, "cost-efficient". Lo encuentro en el contexto de un artículo científico en que se evalúa un instrumento para valorar el ambiente familiar y se encuentra en esta frase: If EA-HOME (la escala en cuestión)...
In the following sentence, is the used of the word: cost-effciency correctly used? Sentence: The Agency conducts visits to identify common implementation issues, cost-efficiency factors and lesson to be learn. Thank you
Cost-efficient and Cost-effective. Thread starter Youzpalang; Start date Oct 1, 2021; Youzpalang Senior ...
The fourth defendant characterized the plaintiff’s motion to allow the fourth defendant to join the proceeding as a not cost-efficient procedure/procedure which is not cost effective. Hi which of these do you prefer? thanks, A.
Hi, if there's a car that's fuel-efficient, can you also call it cost-effective? A report I need to translate into English contains a consumer's comment like... "The car is cost-effective because it's fuel-efficient." or "The car has good cost-performance because it's fuel-efficient." If neither term is inappropriate, what term would you ...
She's efficient at everything she does. She's efficient in everything she does. Both sentences mean the same thing. In your examples, I like the prepositions as they are used. Efficient at finding gold (in is possible). Efficient in its use of fuel (Scotgrot's suggestion "efficient at using fuel" sounds good too).