Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 595 U.S. ___ (2022), is a Supreme Court of the United States case before the Court on an application for a stay of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's COVID-19 vaccination or test mandate. On January 13, 2022, the Supreme Court ordered a stay of the mandate. [1]
Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, 598 U.S. 651 (2023), also known as Sackett II (to distinguish it from the 2012 case), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that only wetlands and permanent bodies of water with a "continuous surface connection" to "traditional interstate navigable waters" are covered by the Clean Water Act.
The Biden administration was blocked on Tuesday from enforcing two mandates requiring millions of American workers to get vaccinated against COVID-19, a key part of its strategy for controlling ...
The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled on Friday to hear oral arguments on the Biden administration’s right to enforce two vaccine mandates that impact more than 100 million U.S. workers, and that ...
The Sacketts returned to the Supreme Court after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in San Francisco, ruled in August 2021 in favor of the federal government in its determination that ...
595 U.S. ___ Argued January 7, 2022. Decided January 13, 2022. In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), acting under the direction of President Biden, issued an emergency rule requiring all employers with at least 100 employees to ensure that their employees had either been vaccinated for COVID-19 or show a negative test for ...
Opposition to Covid-19 vaccine mandates could reach a tipping point that sends workers to settle their differences with employers and governments before the Supreme Court.
NC legislators are considering changing the state’s wetlands definition to match the federal government’s, which the Supreme Court sharply limited. Proposed NC law could mean Supreme Court ...