Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Certain acts not to be infringement of copyright (1) The following acts shall not constitute an infringement of copyright, namely,- (q) the reproduction or publication of- (i) any matter which has been published in any Official Gazette except an Act of a Legislature;
Certain acts not to be infringement of copyright (1) The following acts shall not constitute an infringement of copyright, namely,- (q) the reproduction or publication of- (i) any matter which has been published in any Official Gazette except an Act of a Legislature;
While many people tend to use the term fair use to denote copyright exceptions in India, it is a factually wrong usage. While the US and certain other countries follow the broad fair use exception, India follows a different approach towards copyright exceptions. [22] India follows a hybrid approach that allows :
The Norwegian copyright act does not address public domain directly. The Norwegian copyright law defines two basic rights for authors: economic rights and moral rights. [..] For material that is outside the scope of copyright, the phrase «i det fri» («in the free») is used. This corresponds roughly to the term «public domain» in English.
Contributory copyright infringement is a way of imposing secondary liability for infringement of a copyright. It is a means by which a person may be held liable for copyright infringement even though he or she did not directly engage in the infringing activity. [1] It is one of the two forms of secondary liability apart from vicarious liability ...
The position in India is closer to that in EU. First, we follow the fair dealing approach and not the fair use approach. Section 52(1)(a) and (b) mention the specific purposes for which fair dealing exception is available. Hence, the Indian law has not given the Judges wide discretion with respect to this.
OpenAI has asked an Indian court to quash a plea by a group representing Indian and global book publishers that accuse it of copyright breaches, arguing its ChatGPT service only disseminates ...
The court said that in the case of copyright infringement, the province guaranteed to the copyright holder by copyright law – certain exclusive rights – is invaded, but no control, physical or otherwise, is taken over the copyright, nor is the copyright holder wholly deprived of using the copyrighted work or exercising the exclusive rights ...