Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The goal of Nilsimsa is to generate a hash digest of an email message such that the digests of two similar messages are similar to each other. In comparison with cryptographic hash functions such as SHA-1 or MD5, making a small modification to a document does not substantially change the resulting hash of the document. The paper suggests that ...
Non-cryptographic hash functions optimized for software frequently involve the multiplication operation. Since in-hardware multiplication is resource-intensive and frequency-limiting, ASIC-friendlier designs had been proposed, including SipHash (which has an additional benefit of being able to use a secret key for message authentication), NSGAhash, and XORhash.
A file can become corrupted by a variety of ways: faulty storage media, errors in transmission, write errors during copying or moving, software bugs, and so on. Hash-based verification ensures that a file has not been corrupted by comparing the file's hash value to a previously calculated value. If these values match, the file is presumed to be ...
hash HAS-160: 160 bits hash HAVAL: 128 to 256 bits hash JH: 224 to 512 bits hash LSH [19] 256 to 512 bits wide-pipe Merkle–Damgård construction: MD2: 128 bits hash MD4: 128 bits hash MD5: 128 bits Merkle–Damgård construction: MD6: up to 512 bits Merkle tree NLFSR (it is also a keyed hash function) RadioGatún: arbitrary ideal mangling ...
Nilsimsa Hash is an anti-spam focused locality-sensitive hashing algorithm. ssdeep is a fuzzy hashing tool based on context-piecewise triggered hashing to compare files. [4] sdhash is a fuzzy hashing tool based on using bloom filters to determine whether one file is contained within another or how similar two files are to each other. [11]
The subscriber simply compares a hash of the received data file with the known hash from the trusted source. This can lead to two situations: the hash being the same or the hash being different. If the hash results are the same, the systems involved can have an appropriate degree of confidence to the integrity of the received data.
SipHash computes a 64-bit message authentication code from a variable-length message and 128-bit secret key. It was designed to be efficient even for short inputs, with performance comparable to non-cryptographic hash functions, such as CityHash; [4]: 496 [2] this can be used to prevent denial-of-service attacks against hash tables ("hash flooding"), [5] or to authenticate network packets.
The FNV-0 hash differs from the FNV-1 hash only by the initialisation value of the hash variable: [9] [13] algorithm fnv-0 is hash := 0 for each byte_of_data to be hashed do hash := hash × FNV_prime hash := hash XOR byte_of_data return hash. The above pseudocode has the same assumptions that were noted for the FNV-1 pseudocode.