enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. GF (2) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GF(2)

    every element x of GF(2) satisfies x + x = 0 and therefore −x = x; this means that the characteristic of GF(2) is 2; every element x of GF(2) satisfies x 2 = x (i.e. is idempotent with respect to multiplication); this is an instance of Fermat's little theorem. GF(2) is the only field with this property (Proof: if x 2 = x, then either x = 0 or ...

  3. Interior extremum theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interior_extremum_theorem

    In mathematics, the interior extremum theorem, also known as Fermat's theorem, is a theorem which states that at the local extrema of a differentiable function, its derivative is always zero. It belongs to the mathematical field of real analysis and is named after French mathematician Pierre de Fermat .

  4. Finite field - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_field

    As 2 and 3 are coprime, the intersection of GF(4) and GF(8) in GF(64) is the prime field GF(2). The union of GF(4) and GF(8) has thus 10 elements. The remaining 54 elements of GF(64) generate GF(64) in the sense that no other subfield contains any of them. It follows that they are roots of irreducible polynomials of degree 6 over GF(2). This ...

  5. Fermat's Last Theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat's_Last_Theorem

    In number theory, Fermat's Last Theorem (sometimes called Fermat's conjecture, especially in older texts) states that no three positive integers a, b, and c satisfy the equation a n + b n = c n for any integer value of n greater than 2. The cases n = 1 and n = 2 have been known since antiquity to have infinitely many solutions. [1]

  6. Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem for specific exponents

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_Fermat's_Last...

    (u + v) 2 = w 2 + 4s 2 and (u − v) 2 = w 2 − 4s 2. Multiplying these equations together yields (u 2 − v 2) 2 = w 4 − 16s 4. But as Fermat proved, there can be no integer solution to the equation x 4 − y 4 = z 2, of which this is a special case with z = u 2 − v 2, x = w and y = 2s. The first step of Fermat's proof is to factor the ...

  7. Fermat's little theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat's_little_theorem

    If a is not divisible by p, that is, if a is coprime to p, then Fermat's little theorem is equivalent to the statement that a p − 11 is an integer multiple of p, or in symbols: [1] [2] (). For example, if a = 2 and p = 7, then 2 6 = 64, and 64 − 1 = 63 = 7 × 9 is a multiple of 7.

  8. Fermat number - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_number

    If 2 k + 1 is prime and k > 0, then k itself must be a power of 2, [1] so 2 k + 1 is a Fermat number; such primes are called Fermat primes. As of 2023 [update] , the only known Fermat primes are F 0 = 3 , F 1 = 5 , F 2 = 17 , F 3 = 257 , and F 4 = 65537 (sequence A019434 in the OEIS ).

  9. Fermat's theorem on sums of two squares - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat's_theorem_on_sums_of...

    [2] [3] The statement that every prime p of the form + is the sum of two squares is sometimes called Girard's theorem. [4] For his part, Fermat wrote an elaborate version of the statement (in which he also gave the number of possible expressions of the powers of p as a sum of two squares) in a letter to Marin Mersenne dated December 25, 1640 ...