Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Supreme Court declined to weigh in on a climate change case the state of Minnesota is pursuing against ExxonMobil, the American Petroleum Institute trade group and other fossil fuel groups.
The Supreme Court declined to hear appeals by major oil companies to move climate-change lawsuits against them from state to federal courts, with the latter being far more skeptical of such suits.
Republican attorneys general in 19 states have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block several Democratic-led states from pursuing climate change lawsuits against the oil and gas industry in their ...
In 2018, federal Judge William Alsup dismissed the climate lawsuits brought by the cities of San Francisco and Oakland in what The New York Times called a “stinging defeat.” In 2021, the ...
Climate: destruction of a community by climate change: United States federal courts: 2009 Kleppe v. New Mexico: Wildlife: horses and burros: Supreme Court of the United States: 1976 Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District: Wetlands: development and mitigation: Supreme Court of the United States: 2013 Kruger and al. v. The Queen
U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar has urged the Supreme Court to allow climate lawsuits, such as one brought by Honolulu, to proceed under state tort law, despite past federal precedent ...
The Supreme Court puts off a decision on whether to intervene in the fight between blue states and oil industry.
Silver Bay's taconite ponds, 2010. United States of America v. Reserve Mining Company, 408 F. Supp. 1212 (D. Minn. 1976), was a United States District Court for the District of Minnesota case that determined the Reserve Mining Company was responsible for amphibole asbestos fibers found in the public drinking water of Duluth, Minnesota and other North Shore (Minnesota) communities.