enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Philosophical analysis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_analysis

    Philosophical analysis is any of various techniques, typically used by philosophers in the analytic tradition, in order to "break down" (i.e. analyze) philosophical issues. Arguably the most prominent of these techniques is the analysis of concepts , known as conceptual analysis .

  3. Analytic philosophy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytic_philosophy

    Analytic philosophy is a broad movement within Western philosophy, especially anglophone philosophy, focused on analysis as a philosophical method. [a] [b] It is characterized by a clarity of prose; rigor in arguments; and making use of formal logic and mathematics, and, to a lesser degree, the natural sciences.

  4. Philosophy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy

    Philosophy is a systematic study of general and fundamental questions concerning topics like existence, reason, knowledge, value, mind, and language.It is a rational and critical inquiry that reflects on its methods and assumptions.

  5. Analysis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analysis

    Philosophical analysis refers to the clarification and composition of words put together and the entailed meaning behind them. [10] Philosophical analysis dives deeper into the meaning of words and seeks to clarify that meaning by contrasting the various definitions. It is the study of reality, justification of claims, and the analysis of ...

  6. Philosophical methodology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_methodology

    Philosophical methodology encompasses the methods used to philosophize and the study of these methods. Methods of philosophy are procedures for conducting research, creating new theories, and selecting between competing theories. In addition to the description of methods, philosophical methodology also compares and evaluates them.

  7. Paradox of analysis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_analysis

    The paradox of analysis (or Langford–Moore paradox) [1] is a paradox that concerns how an analysis can be both correct and informative. The problem was formulated by philosopher G. E. Moore in his book Principia Ethica, and first named by C. H. Langford in his article "The Notion of Analysis in Moore's Philosophy" (in The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, Northwestern ...

  8. A priori and a posteriori - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_priori_and_a_posteriori

    A priori and a posteriori at the Indiana Philosophy Ontology Project; A priori and a posteriori at PhilPapers "A priori and a posteriori". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. A priori / a posteriori – in the Philosophical Dictionary online. "Rationalism vs. Empiricism" – an article by Peter Markie in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

  9. Ontology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology

    Influenced by Kant's philosophy, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770–1831) linked ontology and logic. He said that being and thought are identical and examined their foundational structures. [202] Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860) rejected Hegel's philosophy and proposed that the world is an expression of a blind and irrational will. [203]