enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Coalition_for_Men...

    [8] [9] On January 23, 2019, the Commission released an interim report outlining the various options. [10] On March 25, 2020, after holding various public hearings, the Commission issued its final report, recommending that as long as the Selective Service System exists, both men and women should be subject to mandatory draft registration. [8] [9]

  3. Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franchise_Tax_Board_of...

    Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt (short: Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Hyatt or Hyatt III), [1] 587 U.S. 230 (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case that determined that unless they consent, states have sovereign immunity from private suits filed against them in the courts of another state.

  4. Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Homeland...

    Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, 591 U.S. 1 (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held by a 5–4 vote that a 2017 U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) order to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration program was "arbitrary and capricious" under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and ...

  5. FTC v. Qualcomm - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTC_v._Qualcomm

    Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Incorporated [1] was a noted American antitrust case, in which the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) accused Qualcomm's licensing agreements as anticompetitive, mainly because their practices excluded competition and harmed competitors in the modern chip market, which according to the FTC, violated both Section 1 and Section 2 of the Sherman Act.

  6. List of court cases involving Alliance Defending Freedom

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_court_cases...

    A landmark Supreme Court case ruling that Title VII protection applies to gay and transgender people. [52] [53] March for Life Education and Defense Fund v. California. In 2017, the Trump administration issued new HHS rules consistent with the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014) and Zubik v.

  7. List of LGBTQ-related cases in the United States Supreme ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_LGBTQ-related...

    The case was heard on October 8, 2019, alongside two other cases, Bostock v. Clayton County and Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda which dealt with Title VII protection related to sexual orientation. The Court ruled in a 6–3 decision under Bostock but covering all three cases on June 15, 2020, that Title VII protection extends to gay and ...

  8. Juliana v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juliana_v._United_States

    The case's plaintiffs were featured on the show on March 3, 2019, [83] and an update that included a broad overview of the case aired on June 23, 2019. [84] In a case modeled on Juliana, the Philadelphia-based Clean Air Council filed a lawsuit in 2017 on behalf of two minors as the plaintiffs against the federal government's efforts to roll ...

  9. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamex_Operations_West...

    Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior Court and Charles Lee, Real Party in Interest, 4 Cal.5th 903 (Cal. 2018) was a landmark case handed down by the California Supreme Court on April 30, 2018. A class of drivers for a same-day delivery company, Dynamex, claimed that they were misclassified as independent contractors and thus unlawfully deprived of ...