Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Interpersonal rejection is a consequence of interpersonal influence. For example, the deviant in this study was rated the lowest by fellow group members on likability and was assigned more menial tasks. Additionally, the slider was less well liked than the mode, despite listening to reason and shifting opinions.
For example, some research suggests that an applicant's cognitive ability, education, training, and work experiences may be better captured in unstructured interviews, whereas an applicant's job knowledge, organizational fit, interpersonal skills, and applied knowledge may be better captured in a structured interview.
For example, when a student fails a test an observer may choose to attribute that action to 'internal' causes, such as insufficient study, laziness, or having a poor work ethic. Alternatively the action might be attributed to 'external' factors such as the difficulty of the test, or real-world stressors that led to distraction.
The term Social Information Processing Theory was originally titled by Salancik and Pfeffer in 1978. [4] They stated that individual perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors are shaped by information cues, such as values, work requirements, and expectations from the social environment, beyond the influence of individual dispositions and traits. [5]
The Goals, Plans, Action theory explains how people use influence over others to accomplish their goals. This theory is prominent in the field of interpersonal communication. The theory is a model for how individuals gain compliance from others. [1] There can be multiple goals related to the need for compliance.
Under the influence of social psychology, especially social identity theory, communication accommodation theory are guided by mainly four assumptions. There are speech and behavioral similarities and dissimilarities in all conversations. The way we perceive the speech and behaviors of another determines our evaluation of the conversation.
The interpersonal gap, in contrast, points inward. To learn what the other person intended, Wallen advocates using specific behavioral skills [17] combined with a genuine intent of understanding the other (the importance of being genuine in one's intention to close gaps is one reflection of the influence of Carl Rogers on Wallen's work). [18]
Online communication behaviors have the possibility to exaggerate the influence on self-expression or self-presentations and following internalization. The theoretical assumption of the inflated interpersonal feedback in CMC pointed out in the hyperpersonal model by Walther [1] is advanced by this research. Hyperpersonal model can be deemed as ...