Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Bryan v. McPherson, 630 F.3d 805 (9th Cir. 2009), was heard by United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in October 2009. Plaintiff-appellee Carl Bryan was tasered by defendant-appellant Officer Brian MacPherson after being pulled over to the side of the road for failure to wear a seat belt.
In his Section 1983 Litigation column, Martin A. Schwartz continues his analysis of cases involving the use of Tasers. He writes: The critical Fourth Amendment issue is whether, under the totality ...
A relatively prominent hyperlink alone however, the court stated, was insufficient to give the user notice of the terms. Although a similar case validated hyperlinked browsewrap terms in PDC Labs Inc. v Hack Co, [9] that case differed in that the website also included a screen stating "Review terms." In conclusion, the court decided Barnes ...
The case was appealed to the Supreme Court at the end of 2020, but with Trump leaving office in January 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that the case was rendered moot. [4] O'Connor-Ratcliff and Zane petitioned the Supreme Court to hear their case on October 4, 2022. On April 24, 2023, the Court granted certiorari.
The state's law, which a federal judge enjoined last month, prohibits firearms in most public places. 9th Circuit Temporarily Restores the Right To Bear Arms As It Mulls California's New Gun-Free ...
A Texas sheriff has been indicted for tampering with evidence in an investigation into the in-custody death of a Black man last year. Sheriff Robert Chody is facing a third-degree felony charge ...
The Court agreed with Blizzard's arguments that WoW purchasers were not legal owners of the game software but instead licensees, in line with the prior Ninth Circuit ruling in Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc.. [3] As licensees, players are required to make use of the software within the scope of the End User License Agreement. In the terms of that ...
Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc., 570 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. 2009), [1] is a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case in which the Ninth Circuit held that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) rules that Yahoo!, Inc., as an Internet service provider cannot be held responsible for failure to remove objectionable content posted to their website by a third party.