enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Employment Division v. Smith - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_Division_v._Smith

    Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), is a United States Supreme Court case that held that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual.

  3. Sohappy v. Smith - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sohappy_v._Smith

    Sohappy v. Smith, 302 F. Supp. 899 (D. Or. 1969), [1] was a federal case heard by the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, decided in 1969 and amended in 1975. It began with fourteen members of the Yakama who sued the U.S. state of Oregon over its fishing regulations.

  4. Bounds v. Smith - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounds_v._Smith

    Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court tested the basic constitutional right of prison inmates’ access to legal documents prior to court. Prison authorities would consequently be required to provide legal assistance or counsel to inmates, whether it be through a trained legal professional or ...

  5. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  6. Smith v. United States (2023) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._United_States_(2023)

    Smith v. United States, 599 U.S. 236 (2023), is a United States Supreme Court case pertaining to Article III and the Sixth Amendment. The Court held that a defendant may be retried following a jury trial conducted in the improper venue before a jury drawn from the incorrect district. [1] [2]

  7. Fellers v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fellers_v._United_States

    Contrary to Fellers's contention otherwise, we conclude that Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 105 S. Ct. 1285, 84 L. Ed. 2d 222 (1985), renders admissible the statements made by Fellers at the jail. In that case, two officers went to Elstad's residence with a warrant to arrest him for the burglary of a neighbor's home.

  8. Oregon defendants without a lawyer must be released from jail ...

    www.aol.com/news/oregon-defendants-without...

    A federal appeals court on Friday upheld a ruling that Oregon defendants must be released from jail after seven days if they don’t have a defense attorney. In its decision, the 9th U.S. Circuit ...

  9. Oregon must get criminal defendants attorneys within 7 days ...

    www.aol.com/news/oregon-must-criminal-defendants...

    Ruling Thursday in a case filed this year by the Federal Public Defender's Office, U.S. District Judge Michael Oregon must get criminal defendants attorneys within 7 days or release them from jail ...