enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ronald Dworkin - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Dworkin

    A theory of law is for Dworkin a theory of how cases ought to be decided and it begins, not with an account of the political organization of a legal system, but with an abstract ideal regulating the conditions under which governments may use coercive force over their subjects. [14] Dworkin in 2008

  3. Law's Empire - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law's_Empire

    Dworkin informs his readers that the concept of law is the theory of what forms the ground of law. The "concept of law" was used by H.L.A. Hart as the title for an approach to law strongly oriented to Anglo-American reading of positive law to which Dworkin would find insufficient for dealing with issues of jurisprudence encountered throughout ...

  4. Hart–Dworkin debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hart–Dworkin_debate

    The Hart–Dworkin debate is a debate in legal philosophy between H. L. A. Hart and Ronald Dworkin. At the heart of the debate lies a Dworkinian critique of Hartian legal positivism, specifically, the theory presented in Hart's book The Concept of Law. While Hart insists that judges are within bounds to legislate on the basis of rules of law ...

  5. Law as integrity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_as_integrity

    In philosophy of law, law as integrity is a theory of law put forward by Ronald Dworkin. In general, it can be described as interpreting the law according to a community . [ 1 ]

  6. Taking Rights Seriously - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taking_Rights_Seriously

    Taking Rights Seriously is a 1977 book about the philosophy of law by the philosopher Ronald Dworkin.In the book, Dworkin argues against the dominant philosophy of Anglo-American legal positivism as presented by H. L. A. Hart in The Concept of Law (1961) and utilitarianism by proposing that rights of the individual against the state exist outside of the written law and function as "trumps ...

  7. Rule of law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law

    First, Dworkin rejects the need to distinguish between "legal" rules and a more complete political philosophy, since the rule of law is basically the theory of law and adjudication that he believes is correct. Secondly, the rule of law is not simply the thin or formal rule of law; the latter forms part of Dworkin's theory of law and adjudication.

  8. Interpretivism (legal) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretivism_(legal)

    This is the opposite of the main claim of natural law theory. In the English-speaking world, interpretivism is usually identified with Ronald Dworkin 's thesis on the nature of law as discussed in his text titled Law's Empire , which is sometimes seen as a third way between natural law and legal positivism.

  9. Jurisprudence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurisprudence

    Jurisprudence, also known as theory of law or philosophy of law, is the examination in a general perspective of what law is and what it ought to be.It investigates issues such as the definition of law; legal validity; legal norms and values; as well as the relationship between law and other fields of study, including economics, ethics, history, sociology, and political philosophy.