enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdi_v._Rumsfeld

    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court recognized the power of the U.S. government to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens must have the rights of due process, and the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an impartial authority.

  3. Hamdan v. Rumsfeld - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld

    Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that military commissions set up by the Bush administration to try detainees at Guantanamo Bay violated both the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and the Geneva Conventions ratified by the U.S. [1]

  4. Combatant Status Review Tribunal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combatant_Status_Review...

    The CSRTs were established July 7, 2004 by order of U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz [4] after U.S. Supreme Court rulings in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld [5] and Rasul v. Bush [6] and were coordinated through the Office for the Administrative Review of the Detention of Enemy Combatants.

  5. Military tribunals in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_tribunals_in_the...

    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court recognized the power of the U.S. government to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens must have the rights of due process, and the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an ...

  6. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 542

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case name Citation Date decided Elk Grove Unified School Dist. v. Newdow: 542 U.S. 1: 2004: Norton v. S. Utah Wilderness Alliance: 542 U.S. 55: 2004: United States v.

  7. Hedges Amicus Brief FINAL - HuffPost

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-02-01-ThreeAmigos...

    Nos. 12-3176, 12-3644 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT CHRISTOPHER HEDGES, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BARACK OBAMA, individually and as

  8. List of Saudi detainees at Guantanamo Bay - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Saudi_detainees_at...

    In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004), the Supreme Court ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens must have the rights of due process, and the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an impartial authority. After this decision, the government made a deal with Hamdi.

  9. Discover the latest breaking news in the U.S. and around the world — politics, weather, entertainment, lifestyle, finance, sports and much more.