Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
If we consider every outcome that has equal or lower probability than "3 heads 3 tails" as "at least as extreme", then the p-value is exactly / However, suppose we have planned to simply flip the coin 6 times no matter what happens, then the second definition of p -value would mean that the p -value of "3 heads 3 tails" is exactly 1.
The weighted harmonic mean of p-values , …, is defined as = = = /, where , …, are weights that must sum to one, i.e. = =.Equal weights may be chosen, in which case = /.. In general, interpreting the HMP directly as a p-value is anti-conservative, meaning that the false positive rate is higher than expected.
A convenient result, attributed to Samuel S. Wilks, says that as the sample size n approaches the test statistic has asymptotically distribution with degrees of freedom equal to the difference in dimensionality of and parameters the β coefficients as mentioned before on the omnibus test. e.g., if n is large enough and if the fitted model ...
The interval [log 1, log 2] is much wider than the interval [log 9, log 10] (0.30 and 0.05 respectively); therefore if log x is uniformly and randomly distributed, it is much more likely to fall into the wider interval than the narrower interval, i.e. more likely to start with 1 than with 9; the probabilities are proportional to the interval ...
Pearson's correlation coefficient is the covariance of the two variables divided by the product of their standard deviations. The form of the definition involves a "product moment", that is, the mean (the first moment about the origin) of the product of the mean-adjusted random variables; hence the modifier product-moment in the name.
If the fractional part of x is 0.5, choose y randomly between x + 0.5 and x − 0.5, with equal probability. All others are rounded to the closest integer. Like round-half-to-even and round-half-to-odd, this rule is essentially free of overall bias, but it is also fair among even and odd y values. An advantage over alternate tie-breaking is ...
For carbon dioxide, the 50% increase (C/C 0 = 1.5) realized as of year 2020 since 1750 corresponds to a cumulative radiative forcing change (delta F) of +2.17 W/m 2. [6] Assuming no change in the emissions growth path, a doubling of concentrations ( C/C 0 = 2) within the next several decades would correspond to a cumulative radiative forcing ...
5: 0.2188 (5.56) 14 (-1) 0.2092 (5.31)..... 0.220 (5.6)..... 0.010 (0.25) 6: 0.2031 (5.16) 13 (-1) 0.1943 (4.94)..... 0.203 (5.2) 0.162 (4.1) 0.012 (0.30) 7: 0.1875 (4.76) 12 (-1) 0.1793 (4.55)..... 0.1875 (4.76) 0.180 (4.6) 0.1443 (3.67) 0.014 (0.36) 8: 0.1719 (4.37) 11 (-1) 0.1644 (4.18) 0.1681 (4.27) 0.1719 (4.37) 0.165 (4.2) 0.1285 (3.26) 0 ...