enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Swift & Co. v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swift_&_Co._v._United_States

    Swift & Co. v. United States, 196 U.S. 375 (1905), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Commerce Clause allowed the federal government to regulate monopolies if it has a direct effect on commerce. It marked the success of the Presidency of Theodore Roosevelt in destroying the "Beef Trust". This case established a ...

  3. History of United States antitrust law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_United_States...

    Standard Oil (Refinery No. 1 in Cleveland, Ohio, pictured) was a major company broken up under United States antitrust laws.. The history of United States antitrust law is generally taken to begin with the Sherman Antitrust Act 1890, although some form of policy to regulate competition in the market economy has existed throughout the common law's history.

  4. United States antitrust law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_antitrust_law

    Antonio Cucinotta, ed. Post-Chicago Developments in Antitrust Law (2003) David S Evans. Microsoft, Antitrust and the New Economy: Selected Essays (2002) Herbert Hovenkamp, 'Chicago and Its Alternatives' (1986) 6 Duke Law Journal 1014–1029; John E Kwoka and Lawrence J White, eds. The Antitrust Revolution: Economics, Competition, and Policy (2003)

  5. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Oil_Co._of_New...

    Over the course of the 1870s, the Standard Oil Company of Ohio acquired a monopoly on oil refining in the United States. [2] The Cleveland-based company was already among the largest refiners in the United States at the start of the decade, but it controlled only about four percent of the market. [2]

  6. United States v. Alcoa - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Alcoa

    United States v. Alcoa, 148 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1945), [1] is a landmark decision concerning United States antitrust law.Judge Learned Hand's opinion is notable for its discussion of determining the relevant market for market share analysis and—more importantly—its discussion of the circumstances under which a monopoly is guilty of monopolization under section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

  7. Theodore Roosevelt Used This Productivity Trick to Get More ...

    www.aol.com/2016/01/19/theodore-roosevelt...

    Theodore Roosevelt Used This Productivity Trick to Get More Done in a Couple Hours Than Most People Do in a Day Business Insider Updated July 14, 2016 at 10:46 PM

  8. Federal jury says Google’s app store violated antitrust law

    www.aol.com/federal-jury-says-google-app...

    Google’s app store practices violate US antitrust law and the search giant has illegally operated a monopoly in Android app distribution, a federal jury said Monday evening.

  9. Google has an illegal monopoly on search, US judge finds

    www.aol.com/news/u-judge-rules-google-monopoly...

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A U.S. judge ruled on Monday that Google violated antitrust law, spending billions of dollars to create an illegal monopoly and become the world's default search engine, the ...

  1. Related searches monopolies that roosevelt broke up with people in office in chicago in april

    rockefeller's monopoly lawsuithistory of monopoly laws
    rockefeller petroleum monopoly