enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Chief Justice Roberts warns of threats to judges in ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/chief-justice-roberts-warns...

    (The Center square) – U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts warned that judges across the country face increasing threats from disinformation, violence, intimidation and those ...

  3. Chief Justice John Roberts says judicial independence under ...

    www.aol.com/chief-justice-john-roberts-says...

    Threats of violence against judges around the country have been on the rise across the country in recent years, something that Roberts called “wholly unacceptable.” Show comments Advertisement

  4. Threatening government officials of the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threatening_government...

    Threats against federal judges and prosecutors have more than doubled in recent years, with threats against federal prosecutors rising from 116 to 250 from 2003 to 2008, [50] and threats against federal judges climbing from 500 to 1,278 in that same period, [51] [52] prompting hundreds to get 24-hour protection from armed U.S. marshals.

  5. Chief Justice John Roberts sounds alarm over potential ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/chief-justice-john-roberts...

    On the eve of a new year and a second Trump presidency, Chief Justice John Roberts issued a stark warning to the incoming administration, members of Congress and the public about threats to the ...

  6. Obstruction of justice in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstruction_of_justice_in...

    In United States jurisdictions, obstruction of justice refers to a number of offenses that involve unduly influencing, impeding, or otherwise interfering with the justice system, especially the legal and procedural tasks of prosecutors, investigators, or other government officials.

  7. Berghuis v. Thompkins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berghuis_v._Thompkins

    Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370 (2010), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that, unless and until a criminal suspect explicitly states that they are relying on their right to remain silent, their voluntary statements may be used in court and police may continue to question them.

  8. US Marshals Service seeks $38 million for new judge security ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-marshals-seeks-38-million...

    The U.S. Marshals Service is asking Congress for $38 million to fund two new programs aimed at bolstering judicial security in response to a rise in threats against federal judges and U.S. Supreme ...

  9. Hamdan v. Rumsfeld - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld

    Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that military commissions set up by the Bush administration to try detainees at Guantanamo Bay violated both the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and the Geneva Conventions ratified by the U.S. [1]