enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Annual performance reviews are outdated and they’re ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/annual-performance-reviews...

    Making performance reviews more frequent can help make them more equitable. The tech sector is the most likely to conduct reviews more often, with 52% doing so, including Google , Adobe , and ...

  3. Publication bias - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publication_bias

    John Ioannidis argues that "claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias." [46] He lists the following factors as those that make a paper with a positive result more likely to enter the literature and suppress negative-result papers: The studies conducted in a field have small sample sizes.

  4. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Most_Published...

    While the general arguments in the paper recommending reforms in scientific research methodology were well-received, Ionnidis received criticism for the validity of his model and his claim that the majority of scientific findings are false. Responses to the paper suggest lower false positive and false negative rates than what Ionnidis puts forth.

  5. Performance appraisal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_appraisal

    Performance appraisals are most often conducted by an employee's immediate manager or line manager. [3] While extensively practiced, annual performance reviews have also been criticized [4] as providing feedback too infrequently to be useful, and some critics argue that performance reviews in general do more harm than good. It is an element of ...

  6. We analyzed 2 years of performance reviews for 13,000 ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/analyzed-2-years-performance...

    The data set contains performance reviews for more than 13,000 employees across two annual review cycles. Because we have two years of data, we can see whether an employee in the Year 1 data set ...

  7. Systematic review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_review

    A systematic review is a scholarly synthesis of the evidence on a clearly presented topic using critical methods to identify, define and assess research on the topic. [1] A systematic review extracts and interprets data from published studies on the topic (in the scientific literature), then analyzes, describes, critically appraises and summarizes interpretations into a refined evidence-based ...

  8. Clinical peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinical_peer_review

    Clinical peer review, also known as medical peer review is the process by which health care professionals, including those in nursing and pharmacy, evaluate each other's clinical performance. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] A discipline-specific process may be referenced accordingly (e.g., physician peer review , nursing peer review ).

  9. Portfolio Analysis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portfolio_Analysis:...

    Portfolio Analysis: Advanced topics in performance measurement, risk and attribution (Risk Books, 2006. ISBN 1-904339-82-4 ) is an industry text written by a comprehensive selection of industry experts and edited by Timothy P. Ryan .