enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sorrells v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorrells_v._United_States

    Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435 (1932), is a Supreme Court case in which the justices unanimously recognized the entrapment defense. However, while the majority opinion by Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes located the key to entrapment in the defendant's predisposition or lack thereof to commit the crime, Owen Roberts' concurring opinion proposed instead that it be rooted in an ...

  3. Frazier v. Cupp - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frazier_v._Cupp

    Frazier appealed his conviction to the United States Supreme Court on three main points.. The defense argued Frazier was denied his Sixth Amendment right to cross-examine the prosecution's witness, Rawls, because Rawls refused to answer questions after the prosecution referenced elements from his prior statements to police.

  4. Kolender v. Lawson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolender_v._Lawson

    Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 (1983), [1] is a United States Supreme Court case concerning the constitutionality of vague laws that allow police to demand that "loiterers" and "wanderers" provide "credible and reliable" identification.

  5. Lists of United States Supreme Court cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_United_States...

    Court historians and other legal scholars consider each chief justice who presides over the Supreme Court of the United States to be the head of an era of the Court. [1] These lists are sorted chronologically by chief justice and include most major cases decided by the court.

  6. US Supreme Court rules against convicted border drug 'mule ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-rules-against...

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against a California woman convicted of smuggling drugs across the U.S.-Mexican border who challenged prosecution expert testimony ...

  7. Pierson v. Ray - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierson_v._Ray

    Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court first introduced the justification for qualified immunity for police officers from being sued for civil rights violations under Section 1983, by arguing that "[a] policeman's lot is not so unhappy that he must choose between being charged with dereliction of duty if he does not arrest when he had ...

  8. US Supreme Court takes up appeal by convicted border drug 'mule'

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-takes-appeal...

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a California woman's bid to overturn her conviction for smuggling drugs across the U.S.-Mexican border in a dispute over the scope of prosecution ...

  9. Steagald v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steagald_v._United_States

    Steagald v. United States, 451 U.S. 204 (1981), is a United States Supreme Court case which held that, based on the Fourth Amendment, a police officer may not conduct a warrantless search of a third party's home in an attempt to apprehend the subject of an arrest warrant, absent consent or exigent circumstances.