Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
According to a post shared on X by user @quantian1, the purported manifesto is fake, as the Substack account was only two hours old at the time the writing went live. A screenshot included in the ...
In March 2021, Substack revealed that it had been experimenting with a revenue sharing program in which it paid advances for writers to create publications on its platform; this became a program known as Substack Pro. [4] Substack has been criticized for not disclosing which writers were part of Substack Pro. [46]
The author(s) creates a publication, e.g., The Company Newsletter or The Weekly School News. The author is frequently a group, e.g., an organization's marketing department or a fundraising team, but it may be a single-person publication (e.g., Substack newsletters). The author decides what stories to include, and writes them.
Substack said that after a review, it had decided that the five publications had violated the company’s existing content rules, which prohibit content that incites violence based on protected ...
There is a difference between Bellingcat (as an example) setting themselves up as an independent self published publication and some of the recent Substack self publishing; which is effectively the last refuge of at least one journalist unhappy at being expected to follow the usual journalistic rigour and deciding to publish unqualified rumours ...
Professor Heneghan is the Director of Programs in Evidence-Based Health Care at the University of Oxford, running since 2000 as the largest part time program in the Medical Sciences Division. [9] Heneghan writes regularly in the media, including at the Spectator and, along with Tom Jefferson, created the substack Trust the Evidence. [10] [11]
[11] [12] Here, "assess evidence quality" essentially means editors should determine the appropriate type of source and quality of publication. Respect the levels of evidence: Do not reject a higher-level source (e.g., a meta-analysis) in favor of a lower one (e.g., any primary source) because of personal objections to the inclusion criteria ...
The Woozle effect, also known as evidence by citation, [1] occurs when a source is widely cited for a claim that the source does not adequately support, giving said claim undeserved credibility. If results are not replicated and no one notices that a key claim was never well-supported in its original publication, faulty assumptions may affect ...