Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Yumpu was launched in 2011 as a self-publishing service for B2B by Norbert Rom's i-magazine AG (founded 2006). [1] [2] I-magazine AG, in turn, is a subsidiary of adRom Holding AG, which was also founded by Norbert Rom. [3] In 2016, Yummy Publishing GmbH was founded in Austria as a subsidiary of i-Magazine AG, which supports the parent company with various services.
On 1 March 2022, the Asia Video Industry Association's Coalition Against Piracy (CAP) announced that it had obtained a court order from the Singapore High Court for the blocking of 30 illegal streaming sites and nearly 150 domain names associated with those sites.
On 12 August 2015 the whole of Reddit was blocked in Russia by Roskomnadzor because of a post made by a Reddit user on the site. The post is a guide for growing Psilocybe mushrooms. The block was lifted the next day after Reddit complied with Roskomnadzor's demand of blocking access from users in Russia to the specific post. [46] [47]
Service ran from June 2005 to July 2008. Site returned as a licensed provider o Fox TV content, then turned into a typical news portal site. Revver: English: United States: Service ran from October 2005 to 2011. Acquired by LiveUniverse in 2008. Sevenload: 12 languages: Germany: Service ran from April 2006 to April 2014. Smashcast: Multilingual ...
Reddit (/ ˈ r ɛ d ɪ t / ⓘ) is an American social news aggregation, content rating, and forum social network. Registered users (commonly referred to as "Redditors") submit content to the site such as links, text posts, images, and videos, which are then voted up or down ("upvoted" or "downvoted") by other members.
Website Domain name Ranking Type Company / Nonprofit organization Country Similarweb (November 2024) Semrush (December 2024) Google Search: google.com: 1 () 1 () Search Engine
Website Domain URL Category Primary language Duration of blockage Current status Google: google.com: www.google.com drive.google.com chat.google.com scholar.google.com
During these proceedings, Viacom and the other plaintiffs focused on internal e-mails among YouTube employees who were aware of widespread infringement by the platform's users, including specific instances that the district court had said could be considered knowledge that would disqualify YouTube from safe harbor protection. [20] [21] [22]