Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the context of decision making, alignability can influence choices or the ability to make a similarity judgement of a potential option. [17] The alignment process enables a person to draw similarities and difference which impact their choice-supportive biases.
The decision-making process is a reasoning process based on assumptions of values, preferences and beliefs of the decision-maker. [1] Every decision-making process produces a final choice , which may or may not prompt action.
Though outcome-based motivation is the most prominent approach to motivated thinking, there is evidence that a person can be motivated by their preferred strategy of processing information. [2] However, rather than being an alternative, this idea is actually a compliment to the outcome-based approach.
By making calculative decisions, it is considered as rational action. Individuals are often making calculative decisions in social situations by weighing out the pros and cons of an action taken towards a person. The decision to act on a rational decision is also dependent on the unforeseen benefits of the friendship.
Emotional choice theory posits that individual-level decision-making is shaped in significant ways by the interplay between people’s norms, emotions, and identities. While norms and identities are important long-term factors in the decision process, emotions function as short-term, essential motivators for change.
Reasoning and making a judgment regarding the best (most moral) option; Motivation (in the moment but also habitually, such as moral identity) Implementation - having the skills and perseverance to carry out the action; Reynolds and Ceranic researched the effects of social consensus on one's moral behavior.
Improving speed: While making a good decision is important, making a quick decision is also important. Therefore, emotions and associated somatic conditions can offer mechanisms for encouraging a decision maker to decide quickly, especially when one or more options are potentially dangerous. Hunger, anger and fear can all induce a speedy decision.
These cultural differences demonstrate the neural basis that cultural influences can have on an individual's moral reasoning and decision making. [3] Distinctions between theories of moral reasoning can be accounted for by evaluating inferences (which tend to be either deductive or inductive) based on a given set of premises. [4]