Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Deplatforming, also called no-platforming, is a form of Internet censorship of an individual or group by preventing them from posting on the platforms they use to share their information/ideas. This typically involves suspension, outright bans, or reducing spread (shadow banning).
The new system restored the ability to include URLs in comments, which had previously been removed due to problems with abuse. [75] [76] In response, YouTube co-founder Jawed Karim posted the question "why the fuck do I need a google+ account to comment on a video?" on his YouTube channel to express his negative opinion of the change. [77]
File sharing in North Korea is done by hand with physical transport devices such as computer disk drives, due to lack of access to the Internet. It is illegal, due to regime attempts to control culture. [29] Despite government repression, file sharing is common, as it is in most other countries. [30]
Get live expert help with your AOL needs—from email and passwords, technical questions, mobile email and more.
Facebook has been criticized for having lax enforcement of third-party copyrights for videos uploaded to the service. In 2015, some Facebook pages were accused of plagiarizing videos from YouTube users and re-posting them as their own content using Facebook's video platform, and in some cases, achieving higher levels of engagement and views than the original YouTube posts.
Louisiana’s prison system routinely holds people weeks and months after they have completed their sentences, the U.S. Department of Justice alleged in a lawsuit filed Friday. The suit against ...
Dan Russell of CNET rated 3.5/5 stars and wrote, "While many programs lack sufficient feedback for reliable ratings, Should I Remove It is a great place to start looking." [1] Mike Williams of PC Advisor said that crowdsourced data "isn't particularly useful or reliable", but the application provides a good starting point for research. [2]
Getting to the root of the problem. ... family says insurer dropped them without warning due to aerial photos of 500-year-old oak tree on their property — and it would cost them $40K to remove it.