enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Template:ResearchGate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:ResearchGate

    This is the TemplateData for this template used by TemplateWizard, VisualEditor and other tools. See a monthly parameter usage report for Template:ResearchGate in articles based on its TemplateData. TemplateData for ResearchGate

  3. ResearchGate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ResearchGate

    Most of ResearchGate's users are involved in medicine or biology, [10] [12] though it also has participants from engineering, law, computer science, agricultural sciences, and psychology, among others. [10] ResearchGate published an author-level metric in the form of an "RG Score" since 2012. [15] RG score is not a citation impact measure.

  4. Member check - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_check

    In qualitative research, a member check, also known as informant feedback or respondent validation, is a technique used by researchers to help improve the accuracy, credibility, validity, and transferability (also known as applicability, internal validity, [1] or fittingness) of a study. [2]

  5. CRAAP test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRAAP_test

    CRAAP is an acronym for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. [1] Due to a vast number of sources existing online, it can be difficult to tell whether these sources are trustworthy to use as tools for research. The CRAAP test aims to make it easier for educators and students to determine if their sources can be trusted.

  6. Wikipedia:Assessing reliability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assessing...

    For example, an article that is a day old probably will have less reliable information than an article that is 2 years old. An article can be checked for its age by clicking the history tab at the top of the page, clicking "Earliest", and pressing end to see the date of the first edit.

  7. Rankings of academic publishers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rankings_of_academic...

    According to the manifesto, "Science and technology indicators are prone to conceptual ambiguity and uncertainty and require strong assumptions that are not universally accepted. The meaning of citation counts, for example, has long been debated. Thus, best practice uses multiple indicators to provide a more robust and pluralistic picture." [8]

  8. Wikipedia:Evaluating sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Evaluating_sources

    Sources of information are commonly categorized as primary, secondary, or tertiary sources.In brief, a primary source is one close to the event with firsthand knowledge (for example, an eyewitness); a secondary source is at least one step removed (for example, a book about an event written by someone not involved in it); and a tertiary source is an encyclopaedia or textbook that provides a ...

  9. Data quality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_quality

    "the usefulness, accuracy, and correctness of data for its application" [10] Arguably, in all these cases, "data quality" is a comparison of the actual state of a particular set of data to a desired state, with the desired state being typically referred to as "fit for use," "to specification," "meeting consumer expectations," "free of defect ...