Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Penal substitution, also called penal substitutionary atonement and especially in older writings forensic theory, [1] [2] is a theory of the atonement within Protestant Christian theology, which declares that Christ, voluntarily submitting to God the Father's plan, was punished (penalized) in the place of (substitution) sinners, thus satisfying the demands of justice and propitiation, so God ...
He taught the Christian's dialogue with God "allows God to work" for God is "the only One who can make the world both good and happy." According to John Tauler(1290-1361)interior life is the condition of our soul, the offenses against God that we have committed.
Paul taught that the gods, which the idols represented, were daemons (lesser created spirits) and thus, prohibited Christians from worshiping both God and idols: Therefore, my dear friends, flee from idolatry. I speak to sensible people; judge for yourselves what I say …
Despite the attributed title "1 Corinthians", this letter was not the first written by Paul to the church in Corinth, only the first canonical letter. 1 Corinthians is the second known letter of four from Paul to the church in Corinth, as evidenced by Paul's mention of his previous letter in 1 Corinthians 5:9. [26]
Neologistic paraphasias, a substitution with a non-English or gibberish word, follow pauses indicating word-finding difficulty. [13] They can affect any part of speech, and the previously mentioned pause can be used to indicate the relative severity of the neologism; less severe neologistic paraphasias can be recognized as a distortion of a real word, and more severe ones cannot.
The English word atonement originally meant "at-one-ment", i.e. being "at one", in harmony, with someone. [5] According to Collins English Dictionary, it is used to describe the redemption through Jesus' death and resurrection, to reconcile the world to himself, and also of the state of a person having been reconciled to God. [note 4] [6] [7]
“God is coming for all of it, the good, the bad, the scary, the hard,” she continued. “And I think when things are difficult, it throws what is wonderful and joyful into sharper relief, but ...
Hamon goes on to say "there is a big difference between preaching and personal prophecy; between quoting the logos and speaking a rhema; between speaking faith statements based on scriptural truth and speaking the specific mind of the Lord for that individual: between speaking the Word of God and speaking a word from the Lord." [1]