enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Two-source hypothesis - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-source_hypothesis

   In summary, the two-source hypothesis proposes that Matthew and Luke used Mark for its narrative material as well as for the basic structural outline of chronology of Jesus' life; and that Matthew and Luke use a second source, Q (from German Quelle, "source"), not extant, for the sayings (logia) found in both of them but not in Mark.

3. Genealogies in the Bible - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogies_in_the_Bible

   The New Testament provides two accounts of the genealogy of Jesus, one in the Gospel of Matthew and another in the Gospel of Luke. [6] [non-primary source needed] Matthew starts with Abraham, while Luke begins with Adam.{Luke 3:23-38} The lists are identical between Abraham and David but differ radically from that point.

4. Heli (biblical figure) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heli_(biblical_figure)

   The New Testament provides two accounts of the genealogy of Jesus, one in the Gospel of Matthew and another in the Gospel of Luke. [3] Matthew starts with Abraham , while Luke begins with Adam . The lists are identical between Abraham and David , but differ radically from that point.

5. Genealogy of Jesus - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_of_Jesus

   A minority view holds that while Luke gives the genealogy of Joseph, Matthew gives the genealogy of Mary. A few ancient authorities seem to offer this interpretation. [64] Although the Greek text as it stands is plainly against it, it has been proposed that in the original text Matthew had one Joseph as Mary's father and another as her husband.

6. Three-source hypothesis - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-source_hypothesis

   The three-source hypothesis is a candidate solution to the synoptic problem.It combines aspects of the two-source hypothesis and the Farrer hypothesis.It states that the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke used the Gospel of Mark and a sayings collection as primary sources, but that the Gospel of Luke also used the Gospel of Matthew as a subsidiary source.

7. Marcan priority - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcan_priority

   Supporters of Marcan priority see this as Matthew and Luke improving the style of the material they incorporate from Mark. Supporters of Marcan posteriority, however, see Mark as recasting material from Matthew and Luke in his own peculiar style, less like lofty literature and more in a vivid, fast-moving style befitting oral preaching.

8. Shealtiel - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shealtiel

   In contrast, Luke lists a man named Shealtiel who is the son of an otherwise unknown man named Neri (Matthew 1:12 and Luke 3:27–28). Multiple explanations for this difference have been suggested, with one common explanation being that Luke traces the genealogy of Jesus through Mary, in recognition of the virgin birth. [3]

9. Historical reliability of the Gospels - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_reliability_of...

   "Gospels" is the standard term for the four New Testament books carrying the names of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, each recounting the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth (including his dealings with John the Baptist, his trial and execution, the discovery of his empty tomb, and, at least in three of them, his appearances to his disciples after his death).