Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The main idea is to express an integral involving an integer parameter (e.g. power) of a function, represented by I n, in terms of an integral that involves a lower value of the parameter (lower power) of that function, for example I n-1 or I n-2. This makes the reduction formula a type of recurrence relation. In other words, the reduction ...
This means that the upper and lower sums of the function f are evaluated on a partition a = x 0 ≤ x 1 ≤ . . . ≤ x n = b whose values x i are increasing. Geometrically, this signifies that integration takes place "left to right", evaluating f within intervals [ x i , x i +1 ] where an interval with a higher index lies to the right of one ...
The basic idea behind the proof is that we will approximate () by finitely many terms of its Taylor series. Since the derivatives of g {\displaystyle g} are only assumed to exist in a neighborhood of the origin, we will essentially proceed by removing the tail of the integral, applying Taylor's theorem with remainder in the remaining small ...
Suppose a and b are constant, and that f(x) involves a parameter α which is constant in the integration but may vary to form different integrals. Assume that f(x, α) is a continuous function of x and α in the compact set {(x, α) : α 0 ≤ α ≤ α 1 and a ≤ x ≤ b}, and that the partial derivative f α (x, α) exists and is
Then | | = (()) +, where sgn(x) is the sign function, which takes the values −1, 0, 1 when x is respectively negative, zero or positive. This can be proved by computing the derivative of the right-hand side of the formula, taking into account that the condition on g is here for insuring the continuity of the integral.
Sometimes integrals may have two singularities where they are improper. Consider, for example, the function 1/((x + 1) √ x) integrated from 0 to ∞ (shown right). At the lower bound of the integration domain, as x goes to 0 the function goes to ∞, and the upper bound is itself ∞, though the function goes to 0. Thus this is a doubly ...
1.3 Proof. 1.4 Examples: ... 1.5 Examples: Definite integrals. ... We can make progress by considering the problem in the variable X.
This visualization also explains why integration by parts may help find the integral of an inverse function f −1 (x) when the integral of the function f(x) is known. Indeed, the functions x(y) and y(x) are inverses, and the integral ∫ x dy may be calculated as above from knowing the integral ∫ y dx.