enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Schenck v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schenck_v._United_States

    Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court concerning enforcement of the Espionage Act of 1917 during World War I.A unanimous Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., concluded that Charles Schenck and other defendants, who distributed flyers to draft-age men urging resistance to induction, could be convicted of an ...

  3. Shouting fire in a crowded theater - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shouting_fire_in_a_crowded...

    The phrase is a paraphrasing of a dictum, or non-binding statement, from Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.'s opinion in the United States Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States in 1919, which held that the defendant's speech in opposition to the draft during World War I was not protected free speech under the First Amendment of the United ...

  4. Espionage Act of 1917 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Espionage_Act_of_1917

    The Supreme Court disagreed. The Espionage Act limits on free speech were ruled constitutional in the U.S. Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States (1919). [38] Schenck, an anti-war Socialist, had been convicted of violating the Act when he sent anti-draft pamphlets to men eligible for the draft.

  5. Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.

    Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. (March 8, 1841 – March 6, 1935) was an American jurist who served as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1902 to 1932. [A] Holmes is one of the most widely cited and influential Supreme Court justices in American history, noted for his long tenure on the Court and for his pithy opinions—particularly those on civil liberties and American ...

  6. Bad tendency - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_tendency

    The principle, formulated in Patterson v. Colorado (1907), was seemingly overturned with the "clear and present danger" principle used in the landmark case Schenck v. United States (1919), as stated by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. Yet eight months later, at the start of the next term in Abrams v.

  7. Stromberg v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stromberg_v._California

    Stromberg v. California , 283 U.S. 359 (1931), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 7–2, that a California statute banning red flags was unconstitutional because it violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [ 1 ]

  8. Schenck - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schenck

    Frederik V Schenck van Toutenburg (1503–1580), Dutch bishop; George Schenck (1942–2024), American screenwriter; Hal Schenck, American mathematician; James F. Schenck, (1807–1882), rear Admiral in United States Navy; Joe Schenck (1891–1930), singer, one of the duo Van and Schenck; Johannes Schenck (1660–1712), Dutch composer

  9. Imminent lawless action - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action

    United States, 341 U.S. 494, at 507 (1951). These later decisions have fashioned the principle that the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and ...