Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Genographic Project, launched on 13 April 2005 by the National Geographic Society and IBM, was a genetic anthropological study (sales discontinued on 31 May 2019) that aimed to map historical human migrations patterns by collecting and analyzing DNA samples. [1] The final phase of the project was Geno 2.0 Next Generation. [2]
Mapping controversies (MC) is an academic course taught in science studies, [1] stemming from the writings of the French sociologist and philosopher Bruno Latour. [2] MC focuses exclusively on the controversies surrounding scientific knowledge rather than the established scientific facts or outcomes.
A stub template is added to the bottom of stub (tiny) articles, to indicate they are ripe for expansion. For how to, check the box below. To add a stub template to an article on a concept related to sociology, add the {} to the bottom of it; To add a stub template to an article on a sociologist, add the {{sociologist-stub}} to the bottom of it
The author and intellectual Jared Diamond, in the New York Times, notes that geneticists can now go far beyond studying the personal ancestries of participants in National Geographic's Genographic Project, which looked at small sections of their parents' DNA, namely their mother's mitochondrial DNA and their father's Y chromosome. By looking at ...
The project has drawn comparison with the failed Human Genome Diversity Project (HGDP) from the 1990s, which ended after a range of controversies emerged about how the DNA information would be managed. This statement contradicts the HGDP article which does not indicate the the project has been terminated or has not produced any results.
The data in the Genographic project is based on data before Semino et al 2004 and Cruciani et al 2004. Spencer Wells acknowledges this as he is a co-author to this article which states The sub-haplogroup E (E-M40), defined by M40/SRY4064 and M96, was also suggested originated in Africa, and later dispersed to Middle East and Europe about 20,000 ...
(1) journals with higher impact factors were more likely to reject papers submitted as part of the project; (2) the chances were better, if the manuscript was allegedly based on empirical data; (3) peer reviews can be an important asset in the process of revising a manuscript; and (4) when the project authors, with academic education from ...
Aging; Architecture; Art; Astrosociology; Body; Criminology; Consciousness; Culture; Death; Demography; Deviance; Disaster; Economic; Education; Emotion ...