Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
I would stay with Firestorm, and see if another version of it will work for now. Please don't be tempted to go with any viewers not on the approved list of Third Party Viewers. Check your computer graphics card drivers are up-to-date too, and you haven't got excessive clutter on your hard drive. Every little thing can affect how your viewer runs.
I have the classic second life viewer of course, but I don't enjoy it as much as I did in the beggining. Then changed to firestorm, but it's giving me lots of problems and issues even after doing a clean install. Currently using kokua viewer, but I would love to explore other viewers now. Any rec...
Please could someone tell me how to run 2 viewers at the same time. I forgot how too. I know you add something like muliple es to the viewer properties but i can't remember exactly. I'm on imprudence viewerThans in advance
I'm adding a sample screenshot for each scene rendered, and FPS results on a chart, comparing 1080p resolution and 1440p for both viewers, 6.6.17 (Legacy) and 7.1.3 (PBR). Numbers were taken using the same scene with same camera position for both viewers, after 1 minute or so, until the scene seemed to load completely.
Viewers. Followers 4. Explore Questions ... I have to uninstall and reinstall Second Life Viewer everytime ...
Speedlight mostly, although it's a client and not really a viewer. When I need to go to places, and when creating, I vary between the official one, Alchemy, and Genesis. I would use Genesis mostly, for sheer speed, but not for scripting (because it doesn't expand menus downw
If that lets you log in, then it is possible that your Second Life viewer cache also got corrupted. Per a note on a similar JIRA, try the following: Rename your cache folder, C:\Users\YourWindowsLogin\AppData\Local\SecondLife , to something like SecondLife.bak , then start the SecondLife viewer and see if it logs in.
I'd recommend Singularity Viewer too.. Singularity looks and behaves almost exactly like the original LL viewer (because it basically IS the older LL viewer), but has been updated with (most) modern stuff, except PBR (thankfully) and retains the superior Windlight instead of the later (and inferior) EEP system.
Viewers with fewer features, like Radegast, use fewer resources than V1 viewers, which use fewer than the V2/V3 viewers. But you already knew that. What it comes down to is that if you want to run a full-featured viewer, you need a machine with a graphics card (not a graphics chip on the motherboard) that meets or exceeds LL's recommended ...
I have the Linden viewer on Win11 (emergency use only) and both viewers on desktop. The linden viewer works fine for me in Win11. Knowing you probably don't want to USE the Linden viewer :D. I would ALSO TRY running a "fix it" program like Glary Utilities (free version).