Ad
related to: yacoob v grootboom tv full length free audio books on youtube for free mysteries- Log In
Enter the Required Details
To Access Your Account.
- Help
Select the Desired Option
To Get the Help You Need.
- Customer Reviews
See What Our Customers Are Saying
To Get To Know Us Better.
- Read Reviews
Read Our Customer Experiences.
Get To Know Us Better.
- Log In
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The respondents based their claim on two constitutional provisions: section 26 of the Constitution, which provides that everyone has the right of access to adequate housing, thereby imposing an obligation on the State to take reasonable legislative and other measures to ensure the progressive realisation of this right within its available resources; and
Sibiya and Others v Director of Public Prosecutions (Johannesburg High Court) [2006] ZACC 22: 25 S v Shinga; S v O'Connell and Others [2007] ZACC 3: 26 Occupiers of 51 Olivia Road and 197 Main Street v City of Johannesburg [2008] ZACC 1: 27 Njongi v MEC for Welfare, Eastern Cape [2008] ZACC 4: 28 Chagi v Special Investigating Unit [2008] ZACC ...
Irene Grootboom (c. 1969 – 2008) was a South African housing rights activist best known for her victory before the Constitutional Court in 2000. [1] The Court found that the government had not met its obligation to provide adequate alternative housing for the residents of Kraaifontein ’s Wallacedene informal settlement .
Judges Priya Pillai, left, Zak Yacoob, center, and Stephen Rapp, right, listen to the first witness of the 'people's tribunal' where prosecutors symbolically put Russian President Vladimir Putin ...
Zakeria Mohammed "Zak" Yacoob (born 3 March 1948) is a retired South African judge who served in the Constitutional Court of South Africa from February 1998 to January 2013. He was appointed to the bench by Nelson Mandela and retired after serving the maximum 15-year term.
The Grootboom reasonableness test was applied by the Constitutional Court in the Minister of Health v Treatment Action Campaign case (2002). The claimant argued that the Ministry of Health infringed section 27(3) Constitution of South Africa by failing to distribute the free medicine nevirapine that could prevent mother-to-child transmission of ...
Residents of Joe Slovo Community, Western Cape v Thubelisha Homes and Others (Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions and Another, Amici Curiae) [1] is an important case in South African property law, heard by the Constitutional Court [2] on August 21, 2008, with judgment handed down on June 10.
The Constitutional Court discussed freedom of association at length in New Nation Movement v President, in which Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga held that the right to freedom of association implies not only a positive right to be free to form an association but also a negative right, protecting "the freedom not to associate at all, if that be the ...
Ad
related to: yacoob v grootboom tv full length free audio books on youtube for free mysteries