Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Golden Rule is the principle of treating others as one would want to be treated by them. It is sometimes called an ethics of reciprocity, meaning that you should reciprocate to others how you would like them to treat you (not necessarily how they actually treat you).
Kant's objection to the Golden Rule is especially suspect because the categorical imperative (CI) sounds a lot like a paraphrase, or perhaps a close cousin, of the same fundamental idea. In effect, it says that you should act toward others in ways that you would want everyone else to act toward others, yourself included (presumably).
Sportsmanship mainly refers to virtues such as fairness, self-control, courage, and persistence, [2] [full citation needed] and has been associated with interpersonal concepts of treating others and being treated fairly, maintaining self-control if dealing with others, and respect for both authority and opponents. Sportsmanship is also looked ...
Start by treating them how you’d like to be treated.
And just like the Golden Rule of treating others the way we wish to be treated, ... views, and decisions, you are being a good example of respect." — Bethany Bridges. 40. "I have a respect for ...
An example is the requirement to treat other people as ends and not merely as a means to an end. [49] This requirement can be used to argue, for example, that it is wrong to kill a person against their will even if this act would save the lives of several others.
English-speakers often use the word "dignity" in proscriptive and cautionary ways: for example, in politics it can be used to critique the treatment of oppressed and vulnerable groups and peoples, but it has also been applied to cultures and sub-cultures, to religious beliefs and ideals, and even to animals used for food or research.
For example, a researcher who wished to perform tests on patients without their knowledge must be happy for all researchers to do so. [96] She also argues that Kant's requirement of autonomy would mean that a patient must be able to make a fully informed decision about treatment, making it immoral to perform tests on unknowing patients.