enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Axiom of choice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom_of_choice

    Many theorems provable using choice are of an elegant general character: the cardinalities of any two sets are comparable, every nontrivial ring with unity has a maximal ideal, every vector space has a basis, every connected graph has a spanning tree, and every product of compact spaces is compact, among many others. Frequently, the axiom of ...

  3. Tarski's theorem about choice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarski's_theorem_about_choice

    The opposite direction was already known, thus the theorem and axiom of choice are equivalent. Tarski told Jan Mycielski that when he tried to publish the theorem in Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris, Fréchet and Lebesgue refused to present it. Fréchet wrote that an implication between two well known propositions is not a ...

  4. List of statements independent of ZFC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_statements...

    The mathematical statements discussed below are provably independent of ZFC (the canonical axiomatic set theory of contemporary mathematics, consisting of the Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms plus the axiom of choice), assuming that ZFC is consistent. A statement is independent of ZFC (sometimes phrased "undecidable in ZFC") if it can neither be ...

  5. Immersion (mathematics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immersion_(mathematics)

    Hassler Whitney initiated the systematic study of immersions and regular homotopies in the 1940s, proving that for 2m < n + 1 every map f : M m → N n of an m-dimensional manifold to an n-dimensional manifold is homotopic to an immersion, and in fact to an embedding for 2m < n; these are the Whitney immersion theorem and Whitney embedding theorem.

  6. Group structure and the axiom of choice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_Structure_and_the...

    Using the axiom of choice, one can show that for any family S of sets | ⋃S | ≤ | S | × sup { |s| : s ∈ S} (A). [5] Moreover, by Tarski's theorem on choice, another equivalent of the axiom of choice, | X | n = | X | for all finite n (B). Let X be an infinite set and let F denote the set of all finite subsets of X. There is a natural ...

  7. Submanifold - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submanifold

    This image of the open interval (with boundary points identified with the arrow marked ends) is an immersed submanifold. An immersed submanifold of a manifold is the image of an immersion map :; in general this image will not be a submanifold as a subset, and an immersion map need not even be injective (one-to-one) – it can have self-intersections.

  8. Today’s NYT ‘Strands’ Hints, Spangram and Answers for ...

    www.aol.com/today-nyt-strands-hints-spangram...

    Related: 300 Trivia Questions and Answers to Jumpstart Your Fun Game Night What Is Today's Strands Hint for the Theme: "Shape and Bake"? Today's Strands game deals with molds/shapes for a yummy treat.

  9. Luce's choice axiom - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luce's_choice_axiom

    Theorem: Any matching law selection rule satisfies Luce's choice axiom. Conversely, if P ( a ∣ A ) > 0 {\displaystyle P(a\mid A)>0} for all a ∈ A ⊂ X {\displaystyle a\in A\subset X} , then Luce's choice axiom implies that it is a matching law selection rule.