Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Amnesty is (retroactively) granted to buildings without any planning permission such as gecekondus, and to constructions that disregarded official building codes including fire and earthquake safety regulations. [1] Zoning amnesties generally are awarded by authorities for short term economic and political gain.
Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), is a United States Supreme Court case that involved issues concerning statutory standing in antitrust law.. The decision established the rule that indirect purchasers of goods or services along a supply chain cannot seek damages for antitrust violations committed by the original manufacturer or service provider, but it permitted such claims ...
The Supreme Court decision in Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois, 146 U.S. 387 (1892), reaffirmed that each state in its sovereign capacity holds title to all submerged lands within its borders and holds these lands in public trust. [1] This is a foundational case for the public trust doctrine.
In deciding that the municipal building codes in this case could be freely copied, the court relied on the First Circuit's decision in Building Officials & Code Administrators v. Code Technology, Inc., [23] (BOCA)—the only other appellate case addressing a similar enactment of a model building code. The court distinguished cases from the ...
The first 16 recipients of housing reparations in Evanston, Illinois, have been issued their $25,000 grants, and the group has The post Illinois residents receive $25K grants for housing ...
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. 547 U.S. 28 (2006) patented products involved in product tying arrangements are not presumed to have market power under antitrust law Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights: 547 U.S. 47 (2006) law schools receiving federal funds may not ban military recruiters: United States v ...
CHICAGO (WTVO) — A federal appeals court in Chicago ruled that the Illinois assault weapon ban can remain in effect while the law is debated. This decision came on Thursday as lawyers ...
The balcony jutted out eleven feet from the building, one foot farther than permitted by city codes, and had an area of 231 square feet (21.5 m 2), 81 square feet (7.5 m 2) larger than permitted. [4] The balcony also had inadequate supports, [ 4 ] was floored with undersized lengths of wood, and was attached to the walls with screws that were ...