Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The three primary goals of the codification are "simplify user access by codifying all authoritative U.S. GAAP in one spot, ensure that the codification content accurately represented authoritative U.S. GAAP as of July 1, 2009, and to create a codification research system that is up-to-date for the released results of standard-setting activity."
The following is a list of all ASC X12 transaction sets across all releases. [1] X12C: Communications and Controls ... 805 Contract Pricing Proposal 806 Project ...
3: Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements: March 1975: Replaced by SFAS No. 154 4: Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt: March 1975: Rescinded by SFAS No. 145 5: Accounting for Contingencies: March 1975: Amended by SFAS No. 11, 112 and 114 6: Classification of Short-Term Obligations Expected to Be ...
The interpretation numbers come from the Financial Accounting Board's Original Pronouncements as amended 2008/2009 Edition, volume 3. Also, consult this volume for detailed listing of amendments, deletions, and other changes to the individual interpretations prior to 2009 (when the Accounting Standards Codification was issued.)
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) publishes and maintains the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), which is the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP. [2] The FASB published U.S. GAAP in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) beginning in 2008.
The Accredited Standards Committee X12 (also known as ASC X12) is a standards organization.Chartered by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in 1979, [2] it develops and maintains the X12 Electronic data interchange (EDI) and Context Inspired Component Architecture (CICA) standards along with XML schemas which drive business processes globally.
Dyadic number: 3: Triadic number: 4: Tetradic number: the same as dyadic number 5: Pentadic number: 6: Hexadic number: not a field: 7: Heptadic number: 8: Octadic number: the same as dyadic number 9: Enneadic number: the same as triadic number 10: Decadic number: not a field 11: Hendecadic number: 12: Dodecadic number: not a field
Thus the 're-subtracting' of 1 leaves a mantissa ending in '100000000000000' instead of '010111000110010', representing a value of '1.1111111111117289E-4' rounded by Excel to 15 significant digits: '1.11111111111173E-4'. Of course mathematical 1 + x − 1 = x, 'floating point math' is sometimes a little different, that is not to be blamed on ...