enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Uttering - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uttering

    In the U.S., uttering is the act of offering a forged document to another when the offeror has knowledge that the document is forged. [9] Uttering does not require that the person who presented the document actually forged or altered the document. For example, forging a log for personal profit might be considered uttering and publishing.

  3. Questioned document examination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Questioned_document...

    Documents feature prominently in all manner of business and personal affairs. Almost any type of document may become disputed in an investigation or litigation. For example, a questioned document may be a sheet of paper bearing handwriting or mechanically-produced text such as a ransom note, a forged cheque, or a business contract.

  4. False evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_evidence

    False evidence, fabricated evidence, forged evidence, fake evidence or tainted evidence is information created or obtained illegally in order to sway the verdict in a court case. Falsified evidence could be created by either side in a case (including the police/ prosecution in a criminal case ), or by someone sympathetic to either side.

  5. Forgery - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forgery

    When the object forged is a record or document it is often called a false document. This usage of "forgery" does not derive from metalwork done at a blacksmith's forge, but it has a parallel history. A sense of "to counterfeit" is already in the Anglo-French verb forger, meaning "falsify". A forgery is essentially concerned with a produced or ...

  6. Mere evidence rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mere_evidence_rule

    The mere evidence rule was drawn from the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in the case Boyd v. United States. [1] In Boyd, the Court ruled that a statute that compelled the production of documents as part of an investigation into the payment of duties was a violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. The Court reasoned that the ...

  7. Marshall v. Holmes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_v._Holmes

    Marshall v. Holmes, 141 U.S. 589, is an 1891 decision of the United States Supreme Court on equitable relief, res judicata and fraud on the court in diversity jurisdiction. . Justice John Marshall Harlan wrote for a unanimous Court that held it unconscionable to allow a state court's decision to stand that had been based on documents later exposed as forge

  8. Forged documents and multi-billion dollar fortunes: Craig ...

    www.aol.com/news/forged-documents-multi-billion...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  9. Presentence investigation report - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presentence_investigation...

    Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure [12] and §6A1.1 of the United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines regulate presentence reports. [13] The report must be disclosed to the court, the defendant, defendant's counsel, and the attorney for the government at least 35 days before the sentencing.